Financhill
Sell
42

CBLUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$11.19
Seasonality move :
0%
Day range:
$11.19 - $11.19
52-week range:
$11.19 - $11.19
Dividend yield:
12.78%
P/E ratio:
5.47x
P/S ratio:
0.58x
P/B ratio:
0.42x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1B
Revenue:
$1.8B
EPS (TTM):
$2.05

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CBLUY
China BlueChemical
-- -- -- -- --
BON
Bon Natural Life
-- -- -- -- --
GURE
Gulf Resources
-- -- -- -- --
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
-- -- -- -- --
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
-- -- -- -- --
SEED
Origin Agritech
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CBLUY
China BlueChemical
$11.19 -- $1B 5.47x $1.43 12.78% 0.58x
BON
Bon Natural Life
$1.76 -- $7M 0.88x $0.00 0% 0.09x
GURE
Gulf Resources
$0.71 -- $7.6M -- $0.00 0% 0.59x
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
$0.43 -- $4.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.05x
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
$0.90 -- $18.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.45x
SEED
Origin Agritech
$1.99 -- $12.6M 2.17x $0.00 0% 0.88x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CBLUY
China BlueChemical
10.87% 0.204 25.64% 4.84x
BON
Bon Natural Life
14.59% -1.254 97.42% 0.76x
GURE
Gulf Resources
-- 0.252 -- 0.65x
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
5.62% -4.942 373.86% 1.01x
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
39.92% 1.291 76.14% 0.14x
SEED
Origin Agritech
-- 7.290 -- 0.16x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CBLUY
China BlueChemical
-- -- 6.4% 7.09% -- --
BON
Bon Natural Life
-- -- 5.99% 6.8% -- --
GURE
Gulf Resources
-$1.8M -$2.8M -49.67% -49.67% -204.04% $518.7K
ITP
IT Tech Packaging
$1.9M -$1.5M -5.5% -5.89% -5.81% $1.2M
RETO
ReTo Eco-Solutions
-- -- -32.57% -85.96% -- --
SEED
Origin Agritech
-- -- -- -- -- --

China BlueChemical vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CBLUY or BON?

    Bon Natural Life has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical's net margin of --. China BlueChemical's return on equity of 7.09% beat Bon Natural Life's return on equity of 6.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    -- -- $2.9B
    BON
    Bon Natural Life
    -- -- $43.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About CBLUY or BON?

    China BlueChemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bon Natural Life has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5581.82%. Given that Bon Natural Life has higher upside potential than China BlueChemical, analysts believe Bon Natural Life is more attractive than China BlueChemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0 0 0
    BON
    Bon Natural Life
    0 0 0
  • Is CBLUY or BON More Risky?

    China BlueChemical has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bon Natural Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUY or BON?

    China BlueChemical has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.78%. Bon Natural Life offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical pays 34.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Bon Natural Life pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUY or BON?

    China BlueChemical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bon Natural Life quarterly revenues of --. China BlueChemical's net income of -- is lower than Bon Natural Life's net income of --. Notably, China BlueChemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.47x while Bon Natural Life's PE ratio is 0.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical is 0.58x versus 0.09x for Bon Natural Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0.58x 5.47x -- --
    BON
    Bon Natural Life
    0.09x 0.88x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CBLUY or GURE?

    Gulf Resources has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical's net margin of -155.77%. China BlueChemical's return on equity of 7.09% beat Gulf Resources's return on equity of -49.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    -- -- $2.9B
    GURE
    Gulf Resources
    -81.58% -$0.33 $166.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CBLUY or GURE?

    China BlueChemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gulf Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1950.05%. Given that Gulf Resources has higher upside potential than China BlueChemical, analysts believe Gulf Resources is more attractive than China BlueChemical.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0 0 0
    GURE
    Gulf Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is CBLUY or GURE More Risky?

    China BlueChemical has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.185, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.497%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUY or GURE?

    China BlueChemical has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.78%. Gulf Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical pays 34.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulf Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUY or GURE?

    China BlueChemical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gulf Resources quarterly revenues of $2.2M. China BlueChemical's net income of -- is lower than Gulf Resources's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, China BlueChemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.47x while Gulf Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical is 0.58x versus 0.59x for Gulf Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0.58x 5.47x -- --
    GURE
    Gulf Resources
    0.59x -- $2.2M -$3.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns CBLUY or ITP?

    IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical's net margin of -7.87%. China BlueChemical's return on equity of 7.09% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    -- -- $2.9B
    ITP
    IT Tech Packaging
    7.65% -$0.20 $174.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About CBLUY or ITP?

    China BlueChemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China BlueChemical has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe China BlueChemical is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0 0 0
    ITP
    IT Tech Packaging
    0 0 0
  • Is CBLUY or ITP More Risky?

    China BlueChemical has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.623, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.348%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUY or ITP?

    China BlueChemical has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.78%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical pays 34.45% of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUY or ITP?

    China BlueChemical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $25.1M. China BlueChemical's net income of -- is lower than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$2M. Notably, China BlueChemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.47x while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical is 0.58x versus 0.05x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0.58x 5.47x -- --
    ITP
    IT Tech Packaging
    0.05x -- $25.1M -$2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CBLUY or RETO?

    ReTo Eco-Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical's net margin of --. China BlueChemical's return on equity of 7.09% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions's return on equity of -85.96%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    -- -- $2.9B
    RETO
    ReTo Eco-Solutions
    -- -- $22.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About CBLUY or RETO?

    China BlueChemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China BlueChemical has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, analysts believe China BlueChemical is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0 0 0
    RETO
    ReTo Eco-Solutions
    0 0 0
  • Is CBLUY or RETO More Risky?

    China BlueChemical has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions has a beta of 1.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.078%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUY or RETO?

    China BlueChemical has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.78%. ReTo Eco-Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical pays 34.45% of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUY or RETO?

    China BlueChemical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ReTo Eco-Solutions quarterly revenues of --. China BlueChemical's net income of -- is lower than ReTo Eco-Solutions's net income of --. Notably, China BlueChemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.47x while ReTo Eco-Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical is 0.58x versus 0.45x for ReTo Eco-Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0.58x 5.47x -- --
    RETO
    ReTo Eco-Solutions
    0.45x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CBLUY or SEED?

    Origin Agritech has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical's net margin of --. China BlueChemical's return on equity of 7.09% beat Origin Agritech's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    -- -- $2.9B
    SEED
    Origin Agritech
    -- -- -$10.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About CBLUY or SEED?

    China BlueChemical has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Agritech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China BlueChemical has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech, analysts believe China BlueChemical is more attractive than Origin Agritech.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0 0 0
    SEED
    Origin Agritech
    0 0 0
  • Is CBLUY or SEED More Risky?

    China BlueChemical has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech has a beta of 1.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.321%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUY or SEED?

    China BlueChemical has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.78%. Origin Agritech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical pays 34.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUY or SEED?

    China BlueChemical quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Origin Agritech quarterly revenues of --. China BlueChemical's net income of -- is lower than Origin Agritech's net income of --. Notably, China BlueChemical's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.47x while Origin Agritech's PE ratio is 2.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical is 0.58x versus 0.88x for Origin Agritech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CBLUY
    China BlueChemical
    0.58x 5.47x -- --
    SEED
    Origin Agritech
    0.88x 2.17x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Will American Tower Stock Recover?
Will American Tower Stock Recover?

The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…

Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?

Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…

Stock Ideas

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 30.64% over the past day.

Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7

Pro-Dex [PDEX] is up 22.41% over the past day.

Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7

Alico [ALCO] is up 18.99% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock