Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
43
CBLUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.26
Seasonality move
:
5.72%
Day range:
$0.26 - $0.26
52-week range:
$0.24 - $0.34
Dividend yield:
6.37%
P/E ratio:
8.55x
P/S ratio:
0.74x
P/B ratio:
0.57x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-16.14%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$1.7B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBLUF
China BlueChemical Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSCGY
China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFY
Enlightify, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MULG
Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVRS
Providence Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBLUF
China BlueChemical Ltd.
|
$0.26 | -- | $1.2B | 8.55x | $0.02 | 6.37% | 0.74x |
|
CSCGY
China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.
|
$4.10 | -- | $892.6M | 45.01x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.48x |
|
ENFY
Enlightify, Inc.
|
$0.37 | -- | $5.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.08x |
|
MULG
Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.
|
$2.55 | -- | $49.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.96x |
|
PVRS
Providence Resources, Inc.
|
$0.0058 | -- | $1.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.38x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
$1.03 | -- | $12.5M | 4.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.61x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBLUF
China BlueChemical Ltd.
|
10.07% | 0.015 | -- | 5.66x |
|
CSCGY
China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.
|
22.79% | 0.000 | -- | 0.59x |
|
ENFY
Enlightify, Inc.
|
12.13% | 0.017 | 95.83% | 1.58x |
|
MULG
Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PVRS
Providence Resources, Inc.
|
-- | -0.233 | -- | 0.49x |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-226.02% | 1.065 | 30.76% | 0.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBLUF
China BlueChemical Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.02% | 5.56% | -- | -- |
|
CSCGY
China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.59% | -0.78% | -- | -- |
|
ENFY
Enlightify, Inc.
|
$3.5M | $1.2M | -12.15% | -13.78% | 8.21% | -$1.3M |
|
MULG
Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVRS
Providence Resources, Inc.
|
$134.9K | -$27.4K | -6.63% | -6.63% | -19.36% | $16.1K |
|
SEED
Origin Agritech Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
China BlueChemical Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBLUF or CSCGY?
China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net margin of --. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.56% beat China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.-- -- $3B CSCGYChina Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.-- -- $3.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CBLUF or CSCGY?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China BlueChemical Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd., analysts believe China BlueChemical Ltd. is more attractive than China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0 0 0 CSCGYChina Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CBLUF or CSCGY More Risky?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.593%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUF or CSCGY?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.37%. China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical Ltd. pays 52.22% of its earnings as a dividend. China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUF or CSCGY?
China BlueChemical Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China BlueChemical Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 45.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical Ltd. is 0.74x versus 0.48x for China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0.74x 8.55x -- -- CSCGYChina Shanshui Cement Group Ltd.0.48x 45.01x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBLUF or ENFY?
Enlightify, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net margin of 7.52%. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.56% beat Enlightify, Inc.'s return on equity of -13.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.-- -- $3B ENFYEnlightify, Inc.23.9% $0.07 $100.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CBLUF or ENFY?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enlightify, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China BlueChemical Ltd. has higher upside potential than Enlightify, Inc., analysts believe China BlueChemical Ltd. is more attractive than Enlightify, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0 0 0 ENFYEnlightify, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBLUF or ENFY More Risky?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enlightify, Inc. has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.196%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUF or ENFY?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.37%. Enlightify, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical Ltd. pays 52.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Enlightify, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUF or ENFY?
China BlueChemical Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enlightify, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.5M. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Enlightify, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, China BlueChemical Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while Enlightify, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical Ltd. is 0.74x versus 0.08x for Enlightify, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0.74x 8.55x -- -- ENFYEnlightify, Inc.0.08x -- $14.5M $1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CBLUF or MULG?
Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net margin of --. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.56% beat Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.-- -- $3B MULGMuliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBLUF or MULG?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China BlueChemical Ltd. has higher upside potential than Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc., analysts believe China BlueChemical Ltd. is more attractive than Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0 0 0 MULGMuliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBLUF or MULG More Risky?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. has a beta of 0.088, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.213%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUF or MULG?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.37%. Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical Ltd. pays 52.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUF or MULG?
China BlueChemical Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China BlueChemical Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical Ltd. is 0.74x versus 4.96x for Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0.74x 8.55x -- -- MULGMuliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.4.96x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBLUF or PVRS?
Providence Resources, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net margin of -19.36%. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.56% beat Providence Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.-- -- $3B PVRSProvidence Resources, Inc.95.34% -$0.00 $1.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CBLUF or PVRS?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Providence Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China BlueChemical Ltd. has higher upside potential than Providence Resources, Inc., analysts believe China BlueChemical Ltd. is more attractive than Providence Resources, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0 0 0 PVRSProvidence Resources, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBLUF or PVRS More Risky?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Providence Resources, Inc. has a beta of -3.696, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 469.607%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUF or PVRS?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.37%. Providence Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical Ltd. pays 52.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Providence Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUF or PVRS?
China BlueChemical Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Providence Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $141.5K. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Providence Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$27.4K. Notably, China BlueChemical Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while Providence Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical Ltd. is 0.74x versus 2.38x for Providence Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0.74x 8.55x -- -- PVRSProvidence Resources, Inc.2.38x -- $141.5K -$27.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns CBLUF or SEED?
Origin Agritech Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net margin of --. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.56% beat Origin Agritech Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.-- -- $3B SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.-- -- -$5.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CBLUF or SEED?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Origin Agritech Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China BlueChemical Ltd. has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech Ltd., analysts believe China BlueChemical Ltd. is more attractive than Origin Agritech Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0 0 0 SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CBLUF or SEED More Risky?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a beta of 0.272, which suggesting that the stock is 72.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech Ltd. has a beta of 1.773, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.269%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBLUF or SEED?
China BlueChemical Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.37%. Origin Agritech Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China BlueChemical Ltd. pays 52.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBLUF or SEED?
China BlueChemical Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Origin Agritech Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China BlueChemical Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Origin Agritech Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China BlueChemical Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.55x while Origin Agritech Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China BlueChemical Ltd. is 0.74x versus 0.61x for Origin Agritech Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBLUFChina BlueChemical Ltd.0.74x 8.55x -- -- SEEDOrigin Agritech Ltd.0.61x 4.43x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 15.34% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 7.22% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 5.48% over the past day.
