CANOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innospec, Inc. has a net margin of -37.49% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of 2.92%. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -49.88% beat Innospec, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.1%.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Innospec, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $99.33 which suggests that it could grow by 27.96%. Given that Innospec, Inc. has higher upside potential than California Nanotechnologies Corp., analysts believe Innospec, Inc. is more attractive than California Nanotechnologies Corp..

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.768, which suggesting that the stock is 23.187% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innospec, Inc. has a beta of 0.931, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.907%.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innospec, Inc. offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innospec, Inc. pays out 109.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $779.9K, which are smaller than Innospec, Inc. quarterly revenues of $441.9M. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$292.4K is lower than Innospec, Inc.'s net income of $12.9M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.79x while Innospec, Inc.'s PE ratio is 98.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 2.53x versus 1.08x for Innospec, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of -37.49% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -49.88% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 42.86%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than California Nanotechnologies Corp., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than California Nanotechnologies Corp..

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.768, which suggesting that the stock is 23.187% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $779.9K, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$292.4K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.79x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 2.53x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of -37.49% compared to California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net margin of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s return on equity of -49.88% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 124.22%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than California Nanotechnologies Corp., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than California Nanotechnologies Corp..

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a beta of 0.768, which suggesting that the stock is 23.187% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California Nanotechnologies Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

California Nanotechnologies Corp. quarterly revenues are $779.9K, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s net income of -$292.4K is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, California Nanotechnologies Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 40.79x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California Nanotechnologies Corp. is 2.53x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.