Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
27
BZLFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.40
Seasonality move
:
2.35%
Day range:
$28.40 - $28.40
52-week range:
$27.60 - $44.51
Dividend yield:
3.46%
P/E ratio:
15.12x
P/S ratio:
0.62x
P/B ratio:
2.76x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
503
1-year change:
-36.19%
Market cap:
$9.2B
Revenue:
$15B
EPS (TTM):
$1.89
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BZLFF
Bunzl Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $59.50 |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
$6.3B | -- | -- | -- | $97.21 |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
$4.2B | -- | -- | -- | $105.17 |
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
|
$883.3M | $0.54 | 6.24% | 49.55% | $16.87 |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
$17.3B | -- | -- | -- | $71.45 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BZLFF
Bunzl Plc
|
$28.40 | -- | $9.2B | 15.12x | $0.27 | 3.46% | 0.62x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco plc
|
$57.24 | $59.50 | $124.4B | 31.92x | $0.75 | 5.38% | 3.81x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
$91.66 | $97.21 | $41.1B | 25.27x | $1.45 | 2.55% | 1.86x |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
$85.66 | $105.17 | $47.6B | 20.23x | $2.52 | 4.83% | 2.35x |
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
|
$12.60 | $16.87 | $1.8B | 8.71x | $0.17 | 5.4% | 0.57x |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
$65.73 | $71.45 | $143.3B | 23.99x | $0.56 | 3.32% | 2.24x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BZLFF
Bunzl Plc
|
51.58% | 0.759 | -- | 0.72x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco plc
|
42.89% | -0.084 | -- | 0.53x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
58.46% | -0.175 | -- | 0.56x |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
68.17% | -0.571 | -- | 0.61x |
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
|
45.19% | -1.196 | 128.32% | 0.55x |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
-- | -0.390 | -- | 0.53x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BZLFF
Bunzl Plc
|
-- | -- | 9.1% | 17.59% | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco plc
|
-- | -- | 3.7% | 6.42% | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
|
-- | -- | 7.77% | 17.57% | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo Plc
|
-- | -- | 6.75% | 18.76% | -- | -- |
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods Ltd.
|
$242.4M | $129.1M | 4.18% | 7.59% | 14.69% | $9.1M |
|
UL
Unilever Plc
|
-- | -- | 18.14% | 25.84% | -- | -- |
Bunzl Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BZLFF or BTI?
British American Tobacco plc has a net margin of -- compared to Bunzl Plc's net margin of --. Bunzl Plc's return on equity of 17.59% beat British American Tobacco plc's return on equity of 6.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BZLFFBunzl Plc-- -- $7.2B BTIBritish American Tobacco plc-- -- $113B -
What do Analysts Say About BZLFF or BTI?
Bunzl Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand British American Tobacco plc has an analysts' consensus of $59.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.31%. Given that British American Tobacco plc has higher upside potential than Bunzl Plc, analysts believe British American Tobacco plc is more attractive than Bunzl Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BZLFFBunzl Plc0 0 0 BTIBritish American Tobacco plc4 1 1 -
Is BZLFF or BTI More Risky?
Bunzl Plc has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison British American Tobacco plc has a beta of 0.319, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.067%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BZLFF or BTI?
Bunzl Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. British American Tobacco plc offers a yield of 5.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Bunzl Plc pays 49.39% of its earnings as a dividend. British American Tobacco plc pays out 169.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Bunzl Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but British American Tobacco plc's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BZLFF or BTI?
Bunzl Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than British American Tobacco plc quarterly revenues of --. Bunzl Plc's net income of -- is lower than British American Tobacco plc's net income of --. Notably, Bunzl Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while British American Tobacco plc's PE ratio is 31.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunzl Plc is 0.62x versus 3.81x for British American Tobacco plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BZLFFBunzl Plc0.62x 15.12x -- -- BTIBritish American Tobacco plc3.81x 31.92x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BZLFF or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has a net margin of -- compared to Bunzl Plc's net margin of --. Bunzl Plc's return on equity of 17.59% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's return on equity of 17.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BZLFFBunzl Plc-- -- $7.2B CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc-- -- $23.2B -
What do Analysts Say About BZLFF or CCEP?
Bunzl Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has an analysts' consensus of $97.21 which suggests that it could grow by 6.16%. Given that Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has higher upside potential than Bunzl Plc, analysts believe Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc is more attractive than Bunzl Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BZLFFBunzl Plc0 0 0 CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc7 3 0 -
Is BZLFF or CCEP More Risky?
Bunzl Plc has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc has a beta of 0.581, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.928%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BZLFF or CCEP?
Bunzl Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.45 per share. Bunzl Plc pays 49.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc pays out 63.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BZLFF or CCEP?
Bunzl Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc quarterly revenues of --. Bunzl Plc's net income of -- is lower than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's net income of --. Notably, Bunzl Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc's PE ratio is 25.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunzl Plc is 0.62x versus 1.86x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BZLFFBunzl Plc0.62x 15.12x -- -- CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners plc1.86x 25.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BZLFF or DEO?
Diageo Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Bunzl Plc's net margin of --. Bunzl Plc's return on equity of 17.59% beat Diageo Plc's return on equity of 18.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BZLFFBunzl Plc-- -- $7.2B DEODiageo Plc-- -- $36.9B -
What do Analysts Say About BZLFF or DEO?
Bunzl Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diageo Plc has an analysts' consensus of $105.17 which suggests that it could grow by 22.77%. Given that Diageo Plc has higher upside potential than Bunzl Plc, analysts believe Diageo Plc is more attractive than Bunzl Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BZLFFBunzl Plc0 0 0 DEODiageo Plc3 3 1 -
Is BZLFF or DEO More Risky?
Bunzl Plc has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo Plc has a beta of 0.450, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BZLFF or DEO?
Bunzl Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Diageo Plc offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Bunzl Plc pays 49.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo Plc pays out 95.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BZLFF or DEO?
Bunzl Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo Plc quarterly revenues of --. Bunzl Plc's net income of -- is lower than Diageo Plc's net income of --. Notably, Bunzl Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Diageo Plc's PE ratio is 20.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunzl Plc is 0.62x versus 2.35x for Diageo Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BZLFFBunzl Plc0.62x 15.12x -- -- DEODiageo Plc2.35x 20.23x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BZLFF or NOMD?
Nomad Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bunzl Plc's net margin of 7.66%. Bunzl Plc's return on equity of 17.59% beat Nomad Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BZLFFBunzl Plc-- -- $7.2B NOMDNomad Foods Ltd.27.57% $0.46 $5.5B -
What do Analysts Say About BZLFF or NOMD?
Bunzl Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomad Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $16.87 which suggests that it could grow by 33.86%. Given that Nomad Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bunzl Plc, analysts believe Nomad Foods Ltd. is more attractive than Bunzl Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BZLFFBunzl Plc0 0 0 NOMDNomad Foods Ltd.4 0 0 -
Is BZLFF or NOMD More Risky?
Bunzl Plc has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomad Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.311%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BZLFF or NOMD?
Bunzl Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Nomad Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 5.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Bunzl Plc pays 49.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomad Foods Ltd. pays out 39.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BZLFF or NOMD?
Bunzl Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nomad Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of $879.2M. Bunzl Plc's net income of -- is lower than Nomad Foods Ltd.'s net income of $67.3M. Notably, Bunzl Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Nomad Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunzl Plc is 0.62x versus 0.57x for Nomad Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BZLFFBunzl Plc0.62x 15.12x -- -- NOMDNomad Foods Ltd.0.57x 8.71x $879.2M $67.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns BZLFF or UL?
Unilever Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Bunzl Plc's net margin of --. Bunzl Plc's return on equity of 17.59% beat Unilever Plc's return on equity of 25.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BZLFFBunzl Plc-- -- $7.2B ULUnilever Plc-- -- $23.4B -
What do Analysts Say About BZLFF or UL?
Bunzl Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unilever Plc has an analysts' consensus of $71.45 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Unilever Plc has higher upside potential than Bunzl Plc, analysts believe Unilever Plc is more attractive than Bunzl Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BZLFFBunzl Plc0 0 0 ULUnilever Plc3 0 0 -
Is BZLFF or UL More Risky?
Bunzl Plc has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever Plc has a beta of 0.357, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.334%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BZLFF or UL?
Bunzl Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Unilever Plc offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Bunzl Plc pays 49.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever Plc pays out 74.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BZLFF or UL?
Bunzl Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever Plc quarterly revenues of --. Bunzl Plc's net income of -- is lower than Unilever Plc's net income of --. Notably, Bunzl Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.12x while Unilever Plc's PE ratio is 23.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunzl Plc is 0.62x versus 2.24x for Unilever Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BZLFFBunzl Plc0.62x 15.12x -- -- ULUnilever Plc2.24x 23.99x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 25
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 25
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
