BURCA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donaldson Co., Inc. has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 12.18%. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat Donaldson Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 25.39%.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Donaldson Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $99.80 which suggests that it could fall by -8.47%. Given that Donaldson Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Burnham Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Donaldson Co., Inc. is more attractive than Burnham Holdings, Inc..

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.407%.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Donaldson Co., Inc. offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Burnham Holdings, Inc. pays 36.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson Co., Inc. pays out 37.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $58.3M, which are smaller than Donaldson Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $935.4M. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $827K is lower than Donaldson Co., Inc.'s net income of $113.9M. Notably, Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.30x while Donaldson Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Burnham Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 3.49x for Donaldson Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International, Inc. has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 11.93%. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat Lennox International, Inc.'s return on equity of 81.28%.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lennox International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $555.40 which suggests that it could grow by 4.8%. Given that Lennox International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Burnham Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Lennox International, Inc. is more attractive than Burnham Holdings, Inc..

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International, Inc. has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.29%.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Lennox International, Inc. offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Burnham Holdings, Inc. pays 36.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International, Inc. pays out 22.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $58.3M, which are smaller than Lennox International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $827K is lower than Lennox International, Inc.'s net income of $142.5M. Notably, Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.30x while Lennox International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 23.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Burnham Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 3.61x for Lennox International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 4.76%. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat Limbach Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.63%.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Limbach Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $122.50 which suggests that it could grow by 42.23%. Given that Limbach Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Burnham Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Limbach Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Burnham Holdings, Inc..

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.294, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.359%.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Limbach Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Burnham Holdings, Inc. pays 36.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $58.3M, which are smaller than Limbach Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.6M. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $827K is lower than Limbach Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $8.8M. Notably, Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.30x while Limbach Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Burnham Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 1.72x for Limbach Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O.A.T., Inc. has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -65.32%. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.97% beat O.A.T., Inc.'s return on equity of -44.42%.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand O.A.T., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Burnham Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than O.A.T., Inc., analysts believe Burnham Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than O.A.T., Inc..

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.185, which suggesting that the stock is 81.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O.A.T., Inc. has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.172%.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. O.A.T., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Burnham Holdings, Inc. pays 36.12% of its earnings as a dividend. O.A.T., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Burnham Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $58.3M, which are larger than O.A.T., Inc. quarterly revenues of $71.8K. Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $827K is higher than O.A.T., Inc.'s net income of -$46.9K. Notably, Burnham Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.30x while O.A.T., Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Burnham Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 8.47x for O.A.T., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.