BLPG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ameriguard Security Services, Inc. has a net margin of 6.88% compared to Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s net margin of 23.61%. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Ameriguard Security Services, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ameriguard Security Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ameriguard Security Services, Inc., analysts believe Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. is more attractive than Ameriguard Security Services, Inc..

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.919, which suggesting that the stock is 91.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ameriguard Security Services, Inc. has a beta of -6.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 717.387%.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ameriguard Security Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ameriguard Security Services, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than Ameriguard Security Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5M. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s net income of $73.8K is lower than Ameriguard Security Services, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.92x while Ameriguard Security Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 757.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.08x for Ameriguard Security Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CompX International, Inc. has a net margin of 6.88% compared to Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s net margin of 10.57%. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat CompX International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.3%.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CompX International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.79%. Given that CompX International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blue Line Protection Group, Inc., analysts believe CompX International, Inc. is more attractive than Blue Line Protection Group, Inc..

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.919, which suggesting that the stock is 91.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CompX International, Inc. has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.335%.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CompX International, Inc. offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CompX International, Inc. pays out 89.11% of its earnings as a dividend. CompX International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than CompX International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $40M. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s net income of $73.8K is lower than CompX International, Inc.'s net income of $4.2M. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.92x while CompX International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 1.80x for CompX International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The GEO Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.88% compared to Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s net margin of 25.49%. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat The GEO Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.22%.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The GEO Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $32.25 which suggests that it could grow by 100.06%. Given that The GEO Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Blue Line Protection Group, Inc., analysts believe The GEO Group, Inc. is more attractive than Blue Line Protection Group, Inc..

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.919, which suggesting that the stock is 91.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The GEO Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.731%.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The GEO Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The GEO Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are smaller than The GEO Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $682.3M. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s net income of $73.8K is lower than The GEO Group, Inc.'s net income of $173.9M. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.92x while The GEO Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 0.89x for The GEO Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wealthcraft Capital, Inc. has a net margin of 6.88% compared to Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Wealthcraft Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wealthcraft Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Wealthcraft Capital, Inc., analysts believe Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. is more attractive than Wealthcraft Capital, Inc..

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.919, which suggesting that the stock is 91.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wealthcraft Capital, Inc. has a beta of -7.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 887.383%.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wealthcraft Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wealthcraft Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.1M, which are larger than Wealthcraft Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s net income of $73.8K is higher than Wealthcraft Capital, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1.92x while Wealthcraft Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. is 0.19x versus 45.31x for Wealthcraft Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.