BIRDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Bird Construction's net margin of 7.31%. Bird Construction's return on equity of 26.59% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.99%.

Bird Construction has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.7%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Bird Construction, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Bird Construction.

Bird Construction has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.44%.

Bird Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Bird Construction pays 31.54% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction quarterly revenues are $658.7M, which are smaller than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Bird Construction's net income of $26.5M is lower than EMCOR Group's net income of $270.3M. Notably, Bird Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 24.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction is 0.41x versus 1.59x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fastenal has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Bird Construction's net margin of 15.61%. Bird Construction's return on equity of 26.59% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

Bird Construction has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.71 which suggests that it could grow by 5.2%. Given that Fastenal has higher upside potential than Bird Construction, analysts believe Fastenal is more attractive than Bird Construction.

Bird Construction has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.268%.

Bird Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Bird Construction pays 31.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction quarterly revenues are $658.7M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Bird Construction's net income of $26.5M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, Bird Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 35.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction is 0.41x versus 5.52x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Bird Construction's net margin of 8.14%. Bird Construction's return on equity of 26.59% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

Bird Construction has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bird Construction has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Bird Construction is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Bird Construction has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.519, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.892%.

Bird Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bird Construction pays 31.54% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bird Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction quarterly revenues are $658.7M, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. Bird Construction's net income of $26.5M is lower than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Bird Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 24.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction is 0.41x versus 1.71x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otis Worldwide has a net margin of 4.03% compared to Bird Construction's net margin of 15.22%. Bird Construction's return on equity of 26.59% beat Otis Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Bird Construction has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Otis Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $101.45 which suggests that it could grow by 9.92%. Given that Otis Worldwide has higher upside potential than Bird Construction, analysts believe Otis Worldwide is more attractive than Bird Construction.

Bird Construction has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.014% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bird Construction has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Otis Worldwide offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Bird Construction pays 31.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Otis Worldwide pays out 38.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bird Construction quarterly revenues are $658.7M, which are smaller than Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Bird Construction's net income of $26.5M is lower than Otis Worldwide's net income of $540M. Notably, Bird Construction's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Otis Worldwide's PE ratio is 23.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bird Construction is 0.41x versus 2.64x for Otis Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.