BGAOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Globalstar has a net margin of 11.21% compared to Proximus SA's net margin of 13.74%. Proximus SA's return on equity of 13.27% beat Globalstar's return on equity of -7.31%.

Proximus SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Globalstar has an analysts' consensus of $3.33 which suggests that it could grow by 69.04%. Given that Globalstar has higher upside potential than Proximus SA, analysts believe Globalstar is more attractive than Proximus SA.

Proximus SA has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.245% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globalstar has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.987%.

Proximus SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.74%. Globalstar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proximus SA pays 108.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Globalstar pays out -48.31% of its earnings as a dividend.

Proximus SA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Globalstar quarterly revenues of $72.3M. Proximus SA's net income of $200.2M is higher than Globalstar's net income of $9.9M. Notably, Proximus SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.31x while Globalstar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proximus SA is 0.25x versus 15.25x for Globalstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orange Belgium SA has a net margin of 11.21% compared to Proximus SA's net margin of --. Proximus SA's return on equity of 13.27% beat Orange Belgium SA's return on equity of 0.34%.

Proximus SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Orange Belgium SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Proximus SA has higher upside potential than Orange Belgium SA, analysts believe Proximus SA is more attractive than Orange Belgium SA.

Proximus SA has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.245% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orange Belgium SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Proximus SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.74%. Orange Belgium SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proximus SA pays 108.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Orange Belgium SA pays out 915.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Proximus SA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Orange Belgium SA quarterly revenues of --. Proximus SA's net income of $200.2M is higher than Orange Belgium SA's net income of --. Notably, Proximus SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.31x while Orange Belgium SA's PE ratio is 235.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proximus SA is 0.25x versus 0.53x for Orange Belgium SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mega Matrix has a net margin of 11.21% compared to Proximus SA's net margin of -26.8%. Proximus SA's return on equity of 13.27% beat Mega Matrix's return on equity of -52.45%.

Proximus SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mega Matrix has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.44%. Given that Mega Matrix has higher upside potential than Proximus SA, analysts believe Mega Matrix is more attractive than Proximus SA.

Proximus SA has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.245% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mega Matrix has a beta of 3.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 201.379%.

Proximus SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.74%. Mega Matrix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proximus SA pays 108.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Mega Matrix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proximus SA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Mega Matrix quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Proximus SA's net income of $200.2M is higher than Mega Matrix's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Proximus SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.31x while Mega Matrix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proximus SA is 0.25x versus 1.89x for Mega Matrix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kartoon Studios has a net margin of 11.21% compared to Proximus SA's net margin of -23.62%. Proximus SA's return on equity of 13.27% beat Kartoon Studios's return on equity of -77.33%.

Proximus SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kartoon Studios has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8716.61%. Given that Kartoon Studios has higher upside potential than Proximus SA, analysts believe Kartoon Studios is more attractive than Proximus SA.

Proximus SA has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.245% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kartoon Studios has a beta of 2.784, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 178.37%.

Proximus SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 24.74%. Kartoon Studios offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proximus SA pays 108.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Kartoon Studios pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proximus SA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Kartoon Studios quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Proximus SA's net income of $200.2M is higher than Kartoon Studios's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Proximus SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.31x while Kartoon Studios's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proximus SA is 0.25x versus 0.62x for Kartoon Studios. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.