AUTLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EESTech has a net margin of -- compared to Austal's net margin of --. Austal's return on equity of 1.5% beat EESTech's return on equity of --.

Austal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EESTech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austal has higher upside potential than EESTech, analysts believe Austal is more attractive than EESTech.

Austal has a beta of 1.255, which suggesting that the stock is 25.497% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EESTech has a beta of -0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.114%.

Austal has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EESTech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austal pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. EESTech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Austal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Austal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EESTech quarterly revenues of --. Austal's net income of -- is lower than EESTech's net income of --. Notably, Austal's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.49x while EESTech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austal is 0.70x versus 0.41x for EESTech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globavend Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Austal's net margin of --. Austal's return on equity of 1.5% beat Globavend Holdings's return on equity of 73.61%.

Austal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Globavend Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austal has higher upside potential than Globavend Holdings, analysts believe Austal is more attractive than Globavend Holdings.

Austal has a beta of 1.255, which suggesting that the stock is 25.497% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globavend Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Austal has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Globavend Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Austal pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Globavend Holdings pays out 136.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Austal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Globavend Holdings's is not.

Austal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Globavend Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Austal's net income of -- is lower than Globavend Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Austal's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.49x while Globavend Holdings's PE ratio is 5.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austal is 0.70x versus 0.51x for Globavend Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GWA Group has a net margin of -- compared to Austal's net margin of --. Austal's return on equity of 1.5% beat GWA Group's return on equity of 12.33%.

Austal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GWA Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austal has higher upside potential than GWA Group, analysts believe Austal is more attractive than GWA Group.

Austal has a beta of 1.255, which suggesting that the stock is 25.497% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GWA Group has a beta of -0.097, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.68%.

Austal has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GWA Group offers a yield of 6.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Austal pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. GWA Group pays out 96.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Austal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GWA Group quarterly revenues of --. Austal's net income of -- is lower than GWA Group's net income of --. Notably, Austal's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.49x while GWA Group's PE ratio is 15.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austal is 0.70x versus 1.44x for GWA Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Atlas Arteria has a net margin of -- compared to Austal's net margin of --. Austal's return on equity of 1.5% beat Atlas Arteria's return on equity of 4.67%.

Austal has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atlas Arteria has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Austal has higher upside potential than Atlas Arteria, analysts believe Austal is more attractive than Atlas Arteria.

Austal has a beta of 1.255, which suggesting that the stock is 25.497% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Arteria has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.55%.

Austal has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atlas Arteria offers a yield of 9.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Austal pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Arteria pays out 179.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Austal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Atlas Arteria's is not.

Austal quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Atlas Arteria quarterly revenues of --. Austal's net income of -- is lower than Atlas Arteria's net income of --. Notably, Austal's price-to-earnings ratio is 69.49x while Atlas Arteria's PE ratio is 20.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Austal is 0.70x versus 43.33x for Atlas Arteria. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.