Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
14
ASASF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.03
Seasonality move
:
-1.95%
Day range:
$0.03 - $0.03
52-week range:
$0.03 - $0.04
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.05x
P/B ratio:
0.04x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
12K
1-year change:
-27.75%
Market cap:
$41.1M
Revenue:
$308.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASASF
Asia Standard International Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEVIF
China Everbright Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASASF
Asia Standard International Group Ltd.
|
$0.03 | -- | $41.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
CEVIF
China Everbright Ltd.
|
$1.23 | -- | $2.1B | -- | $0.01 | 1.04% | 6.34x |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
$1.48 | -- | $667.2M | 10.18x | $0.02 | 1.03% | 10.49x |
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
$0.1250 | -- | $36.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 31.49x |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
$0.0001 | -- | $29.7K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
$0.29 | -- | $520.8M | 18.13x | $0.00 | 0.45% | 6.48x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASASF
Asia Standard International Group Ltd.
|
54.91% | 0.288 | -- | 0.53x |
|
CEVIF
China Everbright Ltd.
|
50.36% | 1.845 | -- | 3.87x |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | 2.135 | -- | 16.97x |
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-22.01% | 94.981 | -- | 0.21x |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -0.337 | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
1.82% | 0.016 | -- | 6.34x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASASF
Asia Standard International Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -16.02% | -34.03% | -- | -- |
|
CEVIF
China Everbright Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -2.81% | -5.51% | -- | -- |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.42% | 3.42% | -- | -- |
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -708.06% | -803.55% | -- | -- |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.86% | 0.88% | -- | -- |
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ASASF or CEVIF?
China Everbright Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.03% beat China Everbright Ltd.'s return on equity of -5.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.-- -- $4B CEVIFChina Everbright Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About ASASF or CEVIF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Everbright Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Everbright Ltd., analysts believe Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is more attractive than China Everbright Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0 0 0 CEVIFChina Everbright Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ASASF or CEVIF More Risky?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.053, which suggesting that the stock is 105.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Everbright Ltd. has a beta of -0.043, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.309%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASASF or CEVIF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Everbright Ltd. offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Asia Standard International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Ltd. pays out 13.01% of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASASF or CEVIF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Everbright Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Everbright Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Everbright Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is 0.05x versus 6.34x for China Everbright Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- CEVIFChina Everbright Ltd.6.34x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASASF or GGPXF?
G-Resources Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.03% beat G-Resources Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.-- -- $4B GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.-- -- $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About ASASF or GGPXF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand G-Resources Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than G-Resources Group Ltd., analysts believe Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is more attractive than G-Resources Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0 0 0 GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ASASF or GGPXF More Risky?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.053, which suggesting that the stock is 105.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-Resources Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.301%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASASF or GGPXF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G-Resources Group Ltd. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Asia Standard International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. G-Resources Group Ltd. pays out 14.59% of its earnings as a dividend. G-Resources Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASASF or GGPXF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than G-Resources Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than G-Resources Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while G-Resources Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is 0.05x versus 10.49x for G-Resources Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.10.49x 10.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASASF or RPGLF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.03% beat Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -803.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.-- -- $4B RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.-- -- -$3.3M -
What do Analysts Say About ASASF or RPGLF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Regent Pacific Group Ltd., analysts believe Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is more attractive than Regent Pacific Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0 0 0 RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ASASF or RPGLF More Risky?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.053, which suggesting that the stock is 105.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a beta of -20.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2174.52%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASASF or RPGLF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asia Standard International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASASF or RPGLF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Regent Pacific Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is 0.05x versus 31.49x for Regent Pacific Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.31.49x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASASF or TLGN?
Ever Harvest International Group has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.03% beat Ever Harvest International Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.-- -- $4B TLGNEver Harvest International Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASASF or TLGN?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ever Harvest International Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ever Harvest International Group, analysts believe Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is more attractive than Ever Harvest International Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0 0 0 TLGNEver Harvest International Group0 0 0 -
Is ASASF or TLGN More Risky?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.053, which suggesting that the stock is 105.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ever Harvest International Group has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.651%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASASF or TLGN?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ever Harvest International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asia Standard International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ever Harvest International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASASF or TLGN?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ever Harvest International Group quarterly revenues of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Ever Harvest International Group's net income of --. Notably, Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ever Harvest International Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is 0.05x versus 0.05x for Ever Harvest International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- TLGNEver Harvest International Group0.05x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASASF or VPGLF?
Value Partners Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.03% beat Value Partners Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.-- -- $4B VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.-- -- $467M -
What do Analysts Say About ASASF or VPGLF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Value Partners Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Value Partners Group Ltd., analysts believe Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is more attractive than Value Partners Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0 0 0 VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ASASF or VPGLF More Risky?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.053, which suggesting that the stock is 105.289% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Value Partners Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.028, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.761%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASASF or VPGLF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Value Partners Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asia Standard International Group Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Partners Group Ltd. pays out 58.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Partners Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASASF or VPGLF?
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Value Partners Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Value Partners Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Asia Standard International Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Value Partners Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asia Standard International Group Ltd. is 0.05x versus 6.48x for Value Partners Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASASFAsia Standard International Group Ltd.0.05x -- -- -- VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.6.48x 18.13x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 27
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
