ARKAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellium SE has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of 4.06%. Arkema SA's return on equity of 2.09% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 13.75%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of $87.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.1%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $20.91 which suggests that it could grow by 10.66%. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Constellium SE, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Constellium SE.

Arkema SA has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 1.551, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.058%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $4.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.79%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arkema SA pays 62% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arkema SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Arkema SA's net income of $40.9M is lower than Constellium SE's net income of $88M. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.73x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 23.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.45x versus 0.34x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Imerys SA has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of 5.77%. Arkema SA's return on equity of 2.09% beat Imerys SA's return on equity of -3.1%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of $87.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.1%. On the other hand Imerys SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Imerys SA, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Imerys SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Imerys SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $4.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.79%. Imerys SA offers a yield of 5.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Arkema SA pays 62% of its earnings as a dividend. Imerys SA pays out 123.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Arkema SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Imerys SA's is not.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Imerys SA quarterly revenues of $886.8M. Arkema SA's net income of $40.9M is lower than Imerys SA's net income of $51.2M. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.73x while Imerys SA's PE ratio is 122.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.45x versus 0.65x for Imerys SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robertet SA has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of --. Arkema SA's return on equity of 2.09% beat Robertet SA's return on equity of 18.2%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of $87.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.1%. On the other hand Robertet SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Robertet SA, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Robertet SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robertet SA has a beta of -0.193, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.254%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $4.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.79%. Robertet SA offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $11.72 per share. Arkema SA pays 62% of its earnings as a dividend. Robertet SA pays out 23.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Robertet SA quarterly revenues of --. Arkema SA's net income of $40.9M is higher than Robertet SA's net income of --. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.73x while Robertet SA's PE ratio is 19.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.45x versus 2.26x for Robertet SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vicat SA has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of --. Arkema SA's return on equity of 2.09% beat Vicat SA's return on equity of 8.64%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of $87.00, signalling upside risk potential of 45.1%. On the other hand Vicat SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Vicat SA, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Vicat SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vicat SA has a beta of 0.259, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.111%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $4.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.79%. Vicat SA offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.28 per share. Arkema SA pays 62% of its earnings as a dividend. Vicat SA pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Vicat SA quarterly revenues of --. Arkema SA's net income of $40.9M is higher than Vicat SA's net income of --. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.73x while Vicat SA's PE ratio is 13.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.45x versus 0.95x for Vicat SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.