ARKAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carbios SA has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of --. Arkema SA's return on equity of 2.09% beat Carbios SA's return on equity of --.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of $87.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.21%. On the other hand Carbios SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Carbios SA, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Carbios SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carbios SA has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.714%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $4.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. Carbios SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arkema SA pays 62% of its earnings as a dividend. Carbios SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arkema SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Carbios SA quarterly revenues of --. Arkema SA's net income of $40.9M is higher than Carbios SA's net income of --. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.32x while Carbios SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.44x versus 1,284.33x for Carbios SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellium SE has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of 4.06%. Arkema SA's return on equity of 2.09% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 13.75%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of $87.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.21%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $19.99 which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Constellium SE, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Constellium SE.

Arkema SA has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 1.551, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.058%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $4.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arkema SA pays 62% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arkema SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Arkema SA's net income of $40.9M is lower than Constellium SE's net income of $88M. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.32x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 22.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.44x versus 0.33x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eramet SA has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of --. Arkema SA's return on equity of 2.09% beat Eramet SA's return on equity of -4.93%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of $87.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.21%. On the other hand Eramet SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Eramet SA, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Eramet SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eramet SA has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.006%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $4.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. Eramet SA offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Arkema SA pays 62% of its earnings as a dividend. Eramet SA pays out 177.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Arkema SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Eramet SA's is not.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Eramet SA quarterly revenues of --. Arkema SA's net income of $40.9M is higher than Eramet SA's net income of --. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.32x while Eramet SA's PE ratio is 114.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.44x versus 0.53x for Eramet SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vallourec SA has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Arkema SA's net margin of 4.64%. Arkema SA's return on equity of 2.09% beat Vallourec SA's return on equity of 14.6%.

Arkema SA has a consensus price target of $87.00, signalling upside risk potential of 47.21%. On the other hand Vallourec SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arkema SA has higher upside potential than Vallourec SA, analysts believe Arkema SA is more attractive than Vallourec SA.

Arkema SA has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vallourec SA has a beta of 0.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.6%.

Arkema SA has a quarterly dividend of $4.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.89%. Vallourec SA offers a yield of 8.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Arkema SA pays 62% of its earnings as a dividend. Vallourec SA pays out 60.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arkema SA quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Vallourec SA quarterly revenues of $978.6M. Arkema SA's net income of $40.9M is lower than Vallourec SA's net income of $45.4M. Notably, Arkema SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.32x while Vallourec SA's PE ratio is 12.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arkema SA is 0.44x versus 1.16x for Vallourec SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.