Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
54
AMVMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$33.00
Seasonality move
:
8.65%
Day range:
$33.00 - $33.00
52-week range:
$13.00 - $39.05
Dividend yield:
1.38%
P/E ratio:
29.85x
P/S ratio:
0.68x
P/B ratio:
1.82x
Volume:
400
Avg. volume:
271
1-year change:
120%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$1.4B
EPS (TTM):
$1.11
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMVMF
AMG Critical Materials NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AKZOY
Akzo Nobel NV
|
$2.9B | -- | 5.48% | -- | $27.15 |
|
AVTXF
Avantium NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSNVY
Corbion NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IMCDY
IMCD NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCINF
OCI NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMVMF
AMG Critical Materials NV
|
$33.00 | -- | $1.1B | 29.85x | $0.23 | 1.38% | 0.68x |
|
AKZOY
Akzo Nobel NV
|
$23.14 | $27.15 | $11.9B | 252.90x | $0.17 | 3.26% | 1.04x |
|
AVTXF
Avantium NV
|
$15.10 | -- | $65.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.35x |
|
CSNVY
Corbion NV
|
$21.20 | -- | $1.2B | 16.71x | $0.72 | 3.41% | 0.88x |
|
IMCDY
IMCD NV
|
$45.35 | -- | $5.4B | 18.26x | $1.22 | 5.36% | 1.01x |
|
OCINF
OCI NV
|
$3.51 | -- | $740.4M | 0.38x | $3.31 | 0% | 0.29x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMVMF
AMG Critical Materials NV
|
58.43% | 2.255 | 71.92% | 0.63x |
|
AKZOY
Akzo Nobel NV
|
57.65% | 0.062 | 50.37% | 0.82x |
|
AVTXF
Avantium NV
|
-- | -1.129 | -- | -- |
|
CSNVY
Corbion NV
|
36.82% | 1.732 | -- | 0.58x |
|
IMCDY
IMCD NV
|
41.75% | 0.506 | -- | 1.27x |
|
OCINF
OCI NV
|
71.1% | 0.619 | 37.69% | 0.09x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMVMF
AMG Critical Materials NV
|
$90M | $34.9M | 3.07% | 7.45% | 8.04% | -$28.6M |
|
AKZOY
Akzo Nobel NV
|
$1.2B | $331.9M | 0.84% | 1.89% | 11.15% | $310.2M |
|
AVTXF
Avantium NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CSNVY
Corbion NV
|
-- | $35.8M | 15.28% | 26.74% | 10.31% | -- |
|
IMCDY
IMCD NV
|
-- | -- | 8.71% | 14.69% | -- | -- |
|
OCINF
OCI NV
|
$58.7M | -$28.4M | -4.37% | -10.39% | -11.68% | $65.1M |
AMG Critical Materials NV vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AMVMF or AKZOY?
Akzo Nobel NV has a net margin of 3.16% compared to AMG Critical Materials NV's net margin of -7.46%. AMG Critical Materials NV's return on equity of 7.45% beat Akzo Nobel NV's return on equity of 1.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV20.7% $0.39 $1.4B AKZOYAkzo Nobel NV40.32% -$0.44 $11.2B -
What do Analysts Say About AMVMF or AKZOY?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Akzo Nobel NV has an analysts' consensus of $27.15 which suggests that it could grow by 17.33%. Given that Akzo Nobel NV has higher upside potential than AMG Critical Materials NV, analysts believe Akzo Nobel NV is more attractive than AMG Critical Materials NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0 0 0 AKZOYAkzo Nobel NV1 0 0 -
Is AMVMF or AKZOY More Risky?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Akzo Nobel NV has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.412%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMVMF or AKZOY?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Akzo Nobel NV offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. AMG Critical Materials NV pays 58.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Akzo Nobel NV pays out 51.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMVMF or AKZOY?
AMG Critical Materials NV quarterly revenues are $434.7M, which are smaller than Akzo Nobel NV quarterly revenues of $3B. AMG Critical Materials NV's net income of $13.7M is higher than Akzo Nobel NV's net income of -$222M. Notably, AMG Critical Materials NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.85x while Akzo Nobel NV's PE ratio is 252.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMG Critical Materials NV is 0.68x versus 1.04x for Akzo Nobel NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0.68x 29.85x $434.7M $13.7M AKZOYAkzo Nobel NV1.04x 252.90x $3B -$222M
-
Which has Higher Returns AMVMF or AVTXF?
Avantium NV has a net margin of 3.16% compared to AMG Critical Materials NV's net margin of --. AMG Critical Materials NV's return on equity of 7.45% beat Avantium NV's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV20.7% $0.39 $1.4B AVTXFAvantium NV-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AMVMF or AVTXF?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Avantium NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AMG Critical Materials NV has higher upside potential than Avantium NV, analysts believe AMG Critical Materials NV is more attractive than Avantium NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0 0 0 AVTXFAvantium NV0 0 0 -
Is AMVMF or AVTXF More Risky?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avantium NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMVMF or AVTXF?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Avantium NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AMG Critical Materials NV pays 58.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Avantium NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMG Critical Materials NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMVMF or AVTXF?
AMG Critical Materials NV quarterly revenues are $434.7M, which are larger than Avantium NV quarterly revenues of --. AMG Critical Materials NV's net income of $13.7M is higher than Avantium NV's net income of --. Notably, AMG Critical Materials NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.85x while Avantium NV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMG Critical Materials NV is 0.68x versus 7.35x for Avantium NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0.68x 29.85x $434.7M $13.7M AVTXFAvantium NV7.35x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AMVMF or CSNVY?
Corbion NV has a net margin of 3.16% compared to AMG Critical Materials NV's net margin of --. AMG Critical Materials NV's return on equity of 7.45% beat Corbion NV's return on equity of 26.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV20.7% $0.39 $1.4B CSNVYCorbion NV-- -- $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About AMVMF or CSNVY?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Corbion NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AMG Critical Materials NV has higher upside potential than Corbion NV, analysts believe AMG Critical Materials NV is more attractive than Corbion NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0 0 0 CSNVYCorbion NV0 0 0 -
Is AMVMF or CSNVY More Risky?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Corbion NV has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.789%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMVMF or CSNVY?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. Corbion NV offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. AMG Critical Materials NV pays 58.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Corbion NV pays out 54.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMVMF or CSNVY?
AMG Critical Materials NV quarterly revenues are $434.7M, which are larger than Corbion NV quarterly revenues of $346.9M. AMG Critical Materials NV's net income of $13.7M is higher than Corbion NV's net income of --. Notably, AMG Critical Materials NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.85x while Corbion NV's PE ratio is 16.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMG Critical Materials NV is 0.68x versus 0.88x for Corbion NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0.68x 29.85x $434.7M $13.7M CSNVYCorbion NV0.88x 16.71x $346.9M --
-
Which has Higher Returns AMVMF or IMCDY?
IMCD NV has a net margin of 3.16% compared to AMG Critical Materials NV's net margin of 5.48%. AMG Critical Materials NV's return on equity of 7.45% beat IMCD NV's return on equity of 14.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV20.7% $0.39 $1.4B IMCDYIMCD NV-- $0.61 $4B -
What do Analysts Say About AMVMF or IMCDY?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IMCD NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AMG Critical Materials NV has higher upside potential than IMCD NV, analysts believe AMG Critical Materials NV is more attractive than IMCD NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0 0 0 IMCDYIMCD NV0 0 0 -
Is AMVMF or IMCDY More Risky?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IMCD NV has a beta of 1.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.76000000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMVMF or IMCDY?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. IMCD NV offers a yield of 5.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. AMG Critical Materials NV pays 58.45% of its earnings as a dividend. IMCD NV pays out 36.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMVMF or IMCDY?
AMG Critical Materials NV quarterly revenues are $434.7M, which are smaller than IMCD NV quarterly revenues of $1.3B. AMG Critical Materials NV's net income of $13.7M is lower than IMCD NV's net income of $72.6M. Notably, AMG Critical Materials NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.85x while IMCD NV's PE ratio is 18.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMG Critical Materials NV is 0.68x versus 1.01x for IMCD NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0.68x 29.85x $434.7M $13.7M IMCDYIMCD NV1.01x 18.26x $1.3B $72.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns AMVMF or OCINF?
OCI NV has a net margin of 3.16% compared to AMG Critical Materials NV's net margin of -3.19%. AMG Critical Materials NV's return on equity of 7.45% beat OCI NV's return on equity of -10.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV20.7% $0.39 $1.4B OCINFOCI NV11.86% -$0.08 $4.1B -
What do Analysts Say About AMVMF or OCINF?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OCI NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AMG Critical Materials NV has higher upside potential than OCI NV, analysts believe AMG Critical Materials NV is more attractive than OCI NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0 0 0 OCINFOCI NV0 0 0 -
Is AMVMF or OCINF More Risky?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 22% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OCI NV has a beta of 0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.898%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMVMF or OCINF?
AMG Critical Materials NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.38%. OCI NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.31 per share. AMG Critical Materials NV pays 58.45% of its earnings as a dividend. OCI NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMG Critical Materials NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AMVMF or OCINF?
AMG Critical Materials NV quarterly revenues are $434.7M, which are smaller than OCI NV quarterly revenues of $494.9M. AMG Critical Materials NV's net income of $13.7M is higher than OCI NV's net income of -$15.8M. Notably, AMG Critical Materials NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.85x while OCI NV's PE ratio is 0.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AMG Critical Materials NV is 0.68x versus 0.29x for OCI NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AMVMFAMG Critical Materials NV0.68x 29.85x $434.7M $13.7M OCINFOCI NV0.29x 0.38x $494.9M -$15.8M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
