AMMX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyster Yale has a net margin of -- compared to AmeraMex International's net margin of 1.69%. AmeraMex International's return on equity of -- beat Hyster Yale's return on equity of 35.93%.

AmeraMex International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyster Yale has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 43.68%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than AmeraMex International, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than AmeraMex International.

AmeraMex International has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.248, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.812%.

AmeraMex International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyster Yale offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. AmeraMex International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale pays out 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AmeraMex International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hyster Yale quarterly revenues of $1B. AmeraMex International's net income of -- is lower than Hyster Yale's net income of $17.2M. Notably, AmeraMex International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyster Yale's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AmeraMex International is 0.20x versus 0.21x for Hyster Yale. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to AmeraMex International's net margin of 10.24%. AmeraMex International's return on equity of -- beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15%.

AmeraMex International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $222.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.42%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than AmeraMex International, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than AmeraMex International.

AmeraMex International has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.033%.

AmeraMex International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. AmeraMex International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AmeraMex International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $983.8M. AmeraMex International's net income of -- is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M. Notably, AmeraMex International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 22.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AmeraMex International is 0.20x versus 2.70x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of -- compared to AmeraMex International's net margin of 16.41%. AmeraMex International's return on equity of -- beat Nordson's return on equity of 16.81%.

AmeraMex International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $257.29 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that Nordson has higher upside potential than AmeraMex International, analysts believe Nordson is more attractive than AmeraMex International.

AmeraMex International has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.831%.

AmeraMex International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. AmeraMex International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AmeraMex International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nordson quarterly revenues of $744.5M. AmeraMex International's net income of -- is lower than Nordson's net income of $122.2M. Notably, AmeraMex International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nordson's PE ratio is 25.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AmeraMex International is 0.20x versus 4.49x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of -- compared to AmeraMex International's net margin of 7.26%. AmeraMex International's return on equity of -- beat Terex's return on equity of 26.74%.

AmeraMex International has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $56.18 which suggests that it could grow by 24.66%. Given that Terex has higher upside potential than AmeraMex International, analysts believe Terex is more attractive than AmeraMex International.

AmeraMex International has a beta of 0.292, which suggesting that the stock is 70.782% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.682%.

AmeraMex International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Terex offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. AmeraMex International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 8.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AmeraMex International quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. AmeraMex International's net income of -- is lower than Terex's net income of $88M. Notably, AmeraMex International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Terex's PE ratio is 6.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AmeraMex International is 0.20x versus 0.60x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.