Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
49
YEAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.61
Seasonality move
:
0.49%
Day range:
$50.56 - $50.58
52-week range:
$50.10 - $50.82
Dividend yield:
4.46%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
114.4K
Avg. volume:
216.6K
1-year change:
0.15%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
|
$50.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 4.46% | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
$50.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 4.41% | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
$50.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 4.88% | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
$50.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 4.6% | -- |
|
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
|
$25.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 5.13% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | 0.083 | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -0.012 | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -0.009 | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | 0.024 | -- | -- |
|
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
|
-- | -0.031 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YEAR
AB Ultra Short Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VRIG
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
AB Ultra Short Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or DUSB?
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or DUSB?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or DUSB More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or DUSB?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or DUSB?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or FLOT?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or FLOT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or FLOT More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.038, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.244%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or FLOT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or FLOT?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or GSY?
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or GSY?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or GSY More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has a beta of 0.100, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.956%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or GSY?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF offers a yield of 4.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or GSY?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YEAR or VRIG?
Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net margin of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About YEAR or VRIG?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AB Ultra Short Income ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF, analysts believe AB Ultra Short Income ETF is more attractive than Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF0 0 0 VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF0 0 0 -
Is YEAR or VRIG More Risky?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF has a beta of 0.052, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.759%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YEAR or VRIG?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF offers a yield of 5.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. AB Ultra Short Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YEAR or VRIG?
AB Ultra Short Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF quarterly revenues of --. AB Ultra Short Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF's net income of --. Notably, AB Ultra Short Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AB Ultra Short Income ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YEARAB Ultra Short Income ETF-- -- -- -- VRIGInvesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
73
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
FEIM alert for Dec 15
Frequency Electronics, Inc. [FEIM] is down 3.51% over the past day.
Buy
57
MOD alert for Dec 15
Modine Manufacturing Co. [MOD] is up 1.79% over the past day.
Sell
42
OKLO alert for Dec 15
Oklo, Inc. [OKLO] is down 5.81% over the past day.
