Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
54
XPP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$21.90
Seasonality move
:
0.14%
Day range:
$21.80 - $21.84
52-week range:
$15.98 - $31.79
Dividend yield:
2.59%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.2K
Avg. volume:
9.3K
1-year change:
-9.31%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPV
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
|
$21.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 2.59% | -- |
|
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF
|
$9.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.37% | -- |
|
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
|
$64.65 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.73% | -- |
|
EPV
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe
|
$21.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 4.21% | -- |
|
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
|
$87.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 1.52% | -- |
|
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
|
$61.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 2.18% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
|
-- | 2.187 | -- | -- |
|
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF
|
-- | 1.015 | -- | -- |
|
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
|
-- | 1.373 | -- | -- |
|
EPV
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe
|
-- | -1.825 | -- | -- |
|
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
|
-- | 1.468 | -- | -- |
|
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
|
-- | 0.677 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPV
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or DRN?
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- DRNDirexion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or DRN?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 DRNDirexion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF0 0 0 -
Is XPP or DRN More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF has a beta of 2.977, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.694%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or DRN?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or DRN?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- DRNDirexion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or EFO?
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- EFOProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or EFO?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 EFOProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE0 0 0 -
Is XPP or EFO More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.474%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or EFO?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or EFO?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- EFOProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or EPV?
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- EPVProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or EPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 EPVProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe0 0 0 -
Is XPP or EPV More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe has a beta of -2.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 304.126%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or EPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or EPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- EPVProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or UPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- UPVProShares Ultra FTSE Europe-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or UPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 UPVProShares Ultra FTSE Europe0 0 0 -
Is XPP or UPV More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has a beta of 1.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or UPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or UPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- UPVProShares Ultra FTSE Europe-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or URE?
ProShares Ultra Real Estate has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Real Estate's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- UREProShares Ultra Real Estate-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or URE?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Real Estate, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Real Estate.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 UREProShares Ultra Real Estate0 0 0 -
Is XPP or URE More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.664, which suggesting that the stock is 33.631% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Real Estate has a beta of 2.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.385%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or URE?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.59%. ProShares Ultra Real Estate offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Real Estate pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or URE?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Real Estate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- UREProShares Ultra Real Estate-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 5
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 5
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 5
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
