Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
53
XPP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.25
Seasonality move
:
2.71%
Day range:
$27.29 - $27.48
52-week range:
$15.98 - $31.79
Dividend yield:
2.47%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.7K
Avg. volume:
6.3K
1-year change:
50.28%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
|
$27.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 2.47% | -- |
|
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
|
$38.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 2.64% | -- |
|
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
|
$8.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 2.65% | -- |
|
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
|
$61.90 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 1.57% | -- |
|
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
|
$86.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 1.62% | -- |
|
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
|
$60.17 | -- | -- | -- | $0.36 | 2.21% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
|
-- | 0.551 | -- | -- |
|
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
|
-- | 0.892 | -- | -- |
|
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | 1.078 | -- | -- |
|
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
|
-- | 0.745 | -- | -- |
|
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
|
-- | 0.675 | -- | -- |
|
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
|
-- | 0.692 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DIG
ProShares Ultra Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRN
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
UPV
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or DIG?
ProShares Ultra Energy has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Energy's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- DIGProShares Ultra Energy-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or DIG?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Energy, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 DIGProShares Ultra Energy0 0 0 -
Is XPP or DIG More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Energy has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.565%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or DIG?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. ProShares Ultra Energy offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or DIG?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Energy quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Energy's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- DIGProShares Ultra Energy-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or DRN?
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- DRNDirexion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or DRN?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 DRNDirexion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares0 0 0 -
Is XPP or DRN More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares has a beta of 3.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 201.05%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or DRN?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or DRN?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- DRNDirexion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X Shares-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or EFO?
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- EFOProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or EFO?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 EFOProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE0 0 0 -
Is XPP or EFO More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.483%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or EFO?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or EFO?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- EFOProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or UPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- UPVProShares Ultra FTSE Europe-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or UPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 UPVProShares Ultra FTSE Europe0 0 0 -
Is XPP or UPV More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe has a beta of 1.726, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.607%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or UPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or UPV?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- UPVProShares Ultra FTSE Europe-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XPP or URE?
ProShares Ultra Real Estate has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Real Estate's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- UREProShares Ultra Real Estate-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XPP or URE?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Real Estate, analysts believe ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Real Estate.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 500 0 0 UREProShares Ultra Real Estate0 0 0 -
Is XPP or URE More Risky?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.94% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Real Estate has a beta of 2.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.292%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XPP or URE?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.47%. ProShares Ultra Real Estate offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Real Estate pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XPP or URE?
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Real Estate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XPPProShares Ultra FTSE China 50-- -- -- -- UREProShares Ultra Real Estate-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 126.95% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 0.44% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 0.97% over the past day.
