Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
26
XMLV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$60.35
Seasonality move
:
0.9%
Day range:
$59.83 - $60.51
52-week range:
$52.03 - $65.99
Dividend yield:
2.26%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
22.3K
Avg. volume:
30.5K
1-year change:
13.83%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPSE
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
|
$60.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 2.26% | -- |
|
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
|
$41.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.29% | -- |
|
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
|
$113.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 0.94% | -- |
|
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
|
$131.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 1.05% | -- |
|
JPSE
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF
|
$46.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 1.67% | -- |
|
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
|
$29.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.76% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | 0.939 | -- | -- |
|
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
|
-- | 1.315 | -- | -- |
|
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
|
-- | 1.689 | -- | -- |
|
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
|
-- | 1.384 | -- | -- |
|
JPSE
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF
|
-- | 1.259 | -- | -- |
|
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
|
-- | 1.335 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRPM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPSE
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XMLV or FSMD?
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- FSMDFidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMLV or FSMD?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 FSMDFidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF0 0 0 -
Is XMLV or FSMD More Risky?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.818%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMLV or FSMD?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMLV or FSMD?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- FSMDFidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XMLV or GRPM?
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- GRPMInvesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMLV or GRPM?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 GRPMInvesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF0 0 0 -
Is XMLV or GRPM More Risky?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF has a beta of 1.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMLV or GRPM?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMLV or GRPM?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- GRPMInvesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XMLV or IWC?
iShares Micro-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Micro-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- IWCiShares Micro-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMLV or IWC?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Micro-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Micro-Cap ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than iShares Micro-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 IWCiShares Micro-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is XMLV or IWC More Risky?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Micro-Cap ETF has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.473%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMLV or IWC?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. iShares Micro-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Micro-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMLV or IWC?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Micro-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Micro-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Micro-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Micro-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- IWCiShares Micro-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XMLV or JPSE?
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- JPSEJPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMLV or JPSE?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 JPSEJPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is XMLV or JPSE More Risky?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.779%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMLV or JPSE?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMLV or JPSE?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- JPSEJPMorgan Diversified Return US Small Cp Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XMLV or QQQS?
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- QQQSInvesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XMLV or QQQS?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is more attractive than Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF0 0 0 QQQSInvesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF0 0 0 -
Is XMLV or QQQS More Risky?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a beta of 0.831, which suggesting that the stock is 16.9% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XMLV or QQQS?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.26%. Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XMLV or QQQS?
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XMLVInvesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF-- -- -- -- QQQSInvesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
