Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?
In February, Pershing Square manager Bill Ackman revealed that his…
Sell
36
VAW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$182.40
Seasonality move
:
1.48%
Day range:
$180.31 - $184.29
52-week range:
$161.43 - $215.82
Dividend yield:
1.82%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
25.3K
Avg. volume:
108.1K
1-year change:
-5.25%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
$184.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.83 | 1.82% | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
$39.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 1.74% | -- |
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
$47.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.74% | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
$7.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 7.36% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$5.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 7.73% | -- |
|
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
|
$83.24 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 2.04% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | 1.182 | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.104 | -- | -- |
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | 1.169 | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | 0.705 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.321 | -- | -- |
|
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
|
-- | 1.072 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns VAW or COPX?
Global X Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VAW or COPX?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is more attractive than Global X Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF0 0 0 COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is VAW or COPX More Risky?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.754%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VAW or COPX?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Global X Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VAW or COPX?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VAW or FMAT?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VAW or FMAT?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is more attractive than Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF0 0 0 FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is VAW or FMAT More Risky?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.313%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VAW or FMAT?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VAW or FMAT?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -- FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VAW or ILIT?
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VAW or ILIT?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is more attractive than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF0 0 0 ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF0 0 0 -
Is VAW or ILIT More Risky?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VAW or ILIT?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF offers a yield of 7.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VAW or ILIT?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -- ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VAW or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VAW or LITP?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is VAW or LITP More Risky?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VAW or LITP?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 7.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VAW or LITP?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VAW or XLB?
Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net margin of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's return on equity of -- beat Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- XLBMaterials Select Sector SPDR Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About VAW or XLB?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has higher upside potential than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund, analysts believe Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is more attractive than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF0 0 0 XLBMaterials Select Sector SPDR Fund0 0 0 -
Is VAW or XLB More Risky?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.945%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VAW or XLB?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.82%. Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VAW or XLB?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund quarterly revenues of --. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net income of -- is lower than Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's net income of --. Notably, Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF is -- versus -- for Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -- XLBMaterials Select Sector SPDR Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Should You Buy Alibaba Stock Despite the Risks?
Markets rebounded slightly after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a…
Why Is Intel Struggling Against AMD?
Due to its disappointing reports, so-so management, and lack of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
48
FI alert for Apr 25
Fiserv [FI] is up 1.25% over the past day.
Buy
66
FARO alert for Apr 25
Faro Technologies [FARO] is up 0.35% over the past day.
Buy
55
PI alert for Apr 25
Impinj [PI] is up 0.78% over the past day.
