Financhill
Buy
55

UNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$15.87
Seasonality move :
-8.46%
Day range:
$15.13 - $16.02
52-week range:
$12.35 - $27.48
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
11.6M
Avg. volume:
9M
1-year change:
-15.59%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
-- -- -- -- --
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
-- -- -- -- --
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
-- -- -- -- --
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
-- -- -- -- --
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-- -- -- -- --
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
$15.87 -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
$25.92 -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
$25.89 -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
$27.60 -- -- -- $0.96 0% --
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
$242.10 -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
$26.92 -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
-- 3.801 -- --
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
-- 0.327 -- --
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
-- 0.328 -- --
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
-- 1.063 -- --
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-- 0.324 -- --
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-- 1.601 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
-- -- -- -- -- --
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
-- -- -- -- -- --
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-- -- -- -- -- --
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-- -- -- -- -- --

United States Natural Gas Fund LP vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns UNG or AAAU?

    Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a net margin of -- compared to United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net margin of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's return on equity of -- beat Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- --
    AAAU
    Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About UNG or AAAU?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United States Natural Gas Fund LP has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF, analysts believe United States Natural Gas Fund LP is more attractive than Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    0 0 0
    AAAU
    Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is UNG or AAAU More Risky?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a beta of 2.186, which suggesting that the stock is 118.565% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF has a beta of 0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.922%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UNG or AAAU?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Natural Gas Fund LP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UNG or AAAU?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF quarterly revenues of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net income of -- is lower than Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's net income of --. Notably, United States Natural Gas Fund LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Natural Gas Fund LP is -- versus -- for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- -- --
    AAAU
    Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns UNG or BAR?

    GraniteShares Gold Trust has a net margin of -- compared to United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net margin of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's return on equity of -- beat GraniteShares Gold Trust's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- --
    BAR
    GraniteShares Gold Trust
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About UNG or BAR?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GraniteShares Gold Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United States Natural Gas Fund LP has higher upside potential than GraniteShares Gold Trust, analysts believe United States Natural Gas Fund LP is more attractive than GraniteShares Gold Trust.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    0 0 0
    BAR
    GraniteShares Gold Trust
    0 0 0
  • Is UNG or BAR More Risky?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a beta of 2.186, which suggesting that the stock is 118.565% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GraniteShares Gold Trust has a beta of 0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.894%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UNG or BAR?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GraniteShares Gold Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Natural Gas Fund LP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GraniteShares Gold Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UNG or BAR?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GraniteShares Gold Trust quarterly revenues of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net income of -- is lower than GraniteShares Gold Trust's net income of --. Notably, United States Natural Gas Fund LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GraniteShares Gold Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Natural Gas Fund LP is -- versus -- for GraniteShares Gold Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- -- --
    BAR
    GraniteShares Gold Trust
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns UNG or DBA?

    Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has a net margin of -- compared to United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net margin of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's return on equity of -- beat Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- --
    DBA
    Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About UNG or DBA?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United States Natural Gas Fund LP has higher upside potential than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund, analysts believe United States Natural Gas Fund LP is more attractive than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    0 0 0
    DBA
    Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is UNG or DBA More Risky?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a beta of 2.186, which suggesting that the stock is 118.565% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco DB Agriculture Fund has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.436%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UNG or DBA?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Invesco DB Agriculture Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. United States Natural Gas Fund LP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco DB Agriculture Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UNG or DBA?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund quarterly revenues of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net income of -- is lower than Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's net income of --. Notably, United States Natural Gas Fund LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco DB Agriculture Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Natural Gas Fund LP is -- versus -- for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- -- --
    DBA
    Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns UNG or GLD?

    SPDR Gold Shares has a net margin of -- compared to United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net margin of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Gold Shares's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- --
    GLD
    SPDR Gold Shares
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About UNG or GLD?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Gold Shares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United States Natural Gas Fund LP has higher upside potential than SPDR Gold Shares, analysts believe United States Natural Gas Fund LP is more attractive than SPDR Gold Shares.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    0 0 0
    GLD
    SPDR Gold Shares
    0 0 0
  • Is UNG or GLD More Risky?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a beta of 2.186, which suggesting that the stock is 118.565% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Gold Shares has a beta of 0.133, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.706%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UNG or GLD?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPDR Gold Shares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Natural Gas Fund LP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Gold Shares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UNG or GLD?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Gold Shares quarterly revenues of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Gold Shares's net income of --. Notably, United States Natural Gas Fund LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Gold Shares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Natural Gas Fund LP is -- versus -- for SPDR Gold Shares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- -- --
    GLD
    SPDR Gold Shares
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns UNG or SLV?

    iShares Silver Trust has a net margin of -- compared to United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net margin of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's return on equity of -- beat iShares Silver Trust's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- --
    SLV
    iShares Silver Trust
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About UNG or SLV?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Silver Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United States Natural Gas Fund LP has higher upside potential than iShares Silver Trust, analysts believe United States Natural Gas Fund LP is more attractive than iShares Silver Trust.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    0 0 0
    SLV
    iShares Silver Trust
    0 0 0
  • Is UNG or SLV More Risky?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a beta of 2.186, which suggesting that the stock is 118.565% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Silver Trust has a beta of 0.861, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.885%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UNG or SLV?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares Silver Trust offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Natural Gas Fund LP pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Silver Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UNG or SLV?

    United States Natural Gas Fund LP quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Silver Trust quarterly revenues of --. United States Natural Gas Fund LP's net income of -- is lower than iShares Silver Trust's net income of --. Notably, United States Natural Gas Fund LP's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Silver Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Natural Gas Fund LP is -- versus -- for iShares Silver Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UNG
    United States Natural Gas Fund LP
    -- -- -- --
    SLV
    iShares Silver Trust
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock