Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
61
UMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.95
Seasonality move
:
2.4%
Day range:
$51.10 - $51.44
52-week range:
$43.80 - $55.05
Dividend yield:
4.08%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
8K
Avg. volume:
14K
1-year change:
-2.13%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USAI
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
$51.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.46 | 4.08% | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
$40.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 8.5% | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
$31.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 4.7% | -- |
|
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
$61.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.73 | 4.75% | -- |
|
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
|
$36.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 3.86% | -- |
|
USAI
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF
|
$39.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 4.82% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | 0.467 | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | 0.591 | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | 0.367 | -- | -- |
|
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | 0.378 | -- | -- |
|
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
|
-- | 0.281 | -- | -- |
|
USAI
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF
|
-- | 0.428 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USAI
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or AMZA?
InfraCap MLP ETF has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat InfraCap MLP ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or AMZA?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand InfraCap MLP ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than InfraCap MLP ETF, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than InfraCap MLP ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF0 0 0 -
Is UMI or AMZA More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InfraCap MLP ETF has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.725%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or AMZA?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. InfraCap MLP ETF offers a yield of 8.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. InfraCap MLP ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or AMZA?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than InfraCap MLP ETF quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than InfraCap MLP ETF's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InfraCap MLP ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for InfraCap MLP ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or ENFR?
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or ENFR?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF0 0 0 -
Is UMI or ENFR More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.487%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or ENFR?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or ENFR?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or MLPX?
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- MLPXGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or MLPX?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 MLPXGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF0 0 0 -
Is UMI or MLPX More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.61%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or MLPX?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 4.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or MLPX?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- MLPXGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or TPYP?
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or TPYP?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline Fund0 0 0 -
Is UMI or TPYP More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.004%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or TPYP?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or TPYP?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- TPYPTortoise North American Pipeline Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or USAI?
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Pacer American Energy Independence ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- USAIPacer American Energy Independence ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or USAI?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer American Energy Independence ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than Pacer American Energy Independence ETF, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than Pacer American Energy Independence ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 USAIPacer American Energy Independence ETF0 0 0 -
Is UMI or USAI More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer American Energy Independence ETF has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.233%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or USAI?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.08%. Pacer American Energy Independence ETF offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer American Energy Independence ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or USAI?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer American Energy Independence ETF quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Pacer American Energy Independence ETF's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer American Energy Independence ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for Pacer American Energy Independence ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- USAIPacer American Energy Independence ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
