Where Will Cisco Systems Stock Be in 10 Years?
Cisco Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSCO) has enjoyed its position as a…
Buy
74
UMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$51.27
Seasonality move
:
10.52%
Day range:
$50.43 - $50.93
52-week range:
$35.96 - $53.99
Dividend yield:
4.31%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
61.1K
Avg. volume:
30.1K
1-year change:
37.67%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
$50.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 4.31% | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
$43.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 7.1% | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
$31.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 4.33% | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
$12.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 6.21% | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
$45.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 0% | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
$43.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 7.67% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | 1.126 | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | 1.824 | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | 1.141 | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | 1.561 | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | 2.109 | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | 1.561 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENFR
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KYN
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SRV
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or AMZA?
InfraCap MLP ETF has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat InfraCap MLP ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or AMZA?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand InfraCap MLP ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than InfraCap MLP ETF, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than InfraCap MLP ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF0 0 0 -
Is UMI or AMZA More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InfraCap MLP ETF has a beta of 1.983, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.255%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or AMZA?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. InfraCap MLP ETF offers a yield of 7.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. InfraCap MLP ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or AMZA?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than InfraCap MLP ETF quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than InfraCap MLP ETF's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while InfraCap MLP ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for InfraCap MLP ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- AMZAInfraCap MLP ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or ENFR?
ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or ENFR?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF0 0 0 -
Is UMI or ENFR More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.702%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or ENFR?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or ENFR?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- ENFRALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or KYN?
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or KYN?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,0 0 0 -
Is UMI or KYN More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a beta of 1.731, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.074%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or KYN?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, offers a yield of 6.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or KYN?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- KYNKayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or SRV?
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or SRV?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund0 0 0 -
Is UMI or SRV More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund has a beta of 1.528, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.817%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or SRV?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or SRV?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- SRVNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns UMI or TYG?
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a net margin of -- compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net margin of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About UMI or TYG?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has higher upside potential than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure, analysts believe USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is more attractive than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund0 0 0 TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure0 0 0 -
Is UMI or TYG More Risky?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 2.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.388%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UMI or TYG?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.31%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure offers a yield of 7.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UMI or TYG?
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues of --. USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's net income of --. Notably, USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund is -- versus -- for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UMIUSCF Midstream Energy Income Fund-- -- -- -- TYGTortoise Energy Infrastructure-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Disney vs Estée Lauder Stock, Which Is Best?
Inflation has eaten away at a lot of the money…
Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is down 0.23% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 4.97% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 8.78% over the past day.
