Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
61
SLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$86.37
Seasonality move
:
4.07%
Day range:
$85.76 - $86.40
52-week range:
$51.69 - $86.40
Dividend yield:
1.52%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
33.9K
Avg. volume:
41.9K
1-year change:
46.43%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
$86.40 | -- | -- | -- | $1.32 | 1.52% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$28.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.72 | 2.47% | -- |
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
$60.70 | -- | -- | -- | $1.36 | 2.25% | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
$30.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 1.5% | -- |
|
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
|
$25.88 | -- | -- | -- | $1.66 | 6.41% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | 1.257 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.698 | -- | -- |
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | 0.637 | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | 2.219 | -- | -- |
|
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | 3.957 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SETM
Sprott Critical Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Steel ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SLX or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Steel ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SLX or CUT?
VanEck Steel ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Steel ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe VanEck Steel ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is SLX or CUT More Risky?
VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.268%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLX or CUT?
VanEck Steel ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. VanEck Steel ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLX or CUT?
VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Steel ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Steel ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Steel ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SLX or HAP?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Steel ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SLX or HAP?
VanEck Steel ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Natural Resources ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Steel ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Natural Resources ETF, analysts believe VanEck Steel ETF is more attractive than VanEck Natural Resources ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 -
Is SLX or HAP More Risky?
VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.846, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.431%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLX or HAP?
VanEck Steel ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. VanEck Natural Resources ETF offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. VanEck Steel ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLX or HAP?
VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Steel ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Steel ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Natural Resources ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Steel ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Natural Resources ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -- HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SLX or PICK?
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Steel ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SLX or PICK?
VanEck Steel ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Steel ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF, analysts believe VanEck Steel ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF0 0 0 -
Is SLX or PICK More Risky?
VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLX or PICK?
VanEck Steel ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VanEck Steel ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLX or PICK?
VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Steel ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Steel ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Steel ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -- PICKiShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SLX or SETM?
Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Steel ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Critical Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SLX or SETM?
VanEck Steel ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Critical Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Steel ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Critical Materials ETF, analysts believe VanEck Steel ETF is more attractive than Sprott Critical Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is SLX or SETM More Risky?
VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Critical Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLX or SETM?
VanEck Steel ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. Sprott Critical Materials ETF offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. VanEck Steel ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Critical Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLX or SETM?
VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Critical Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Steel ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Critical Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Steel ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Critical Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Steel ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Critical Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -- SETMSprott Critical Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SLX or URNJ?
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Steel ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- URNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SLX or URNJ?
VanEck Steel ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Steel ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF, analysts believe VanEck Steel ETF is more attractive than Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 URNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is SLX or URNJ More Risky?
VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.443, which suggesting that the stock is 44.28% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SLX or URNJ?
VanEck Steel ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF offers a yield of 6.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share. VanEck Steel ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SLX or URNJ?
VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Steel ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Steel ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Steel ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -- URNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
