Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
24
SEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$29.80
Seasonality move
:
-2.65%
Day range:
$29.77 - $30.45
52-week range:
$29.77 - $40.06
Dividend yield:
4.43%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
24.7K
Avg. volume:
9.2K
1-year change:
-14.87%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
|
$30.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 4.43% | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
$14.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 6.34% | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
$16.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 10.46% | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
$17.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 4.31% | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
$7.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 5.55% | -- |
|
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
|
$24.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 5.89% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
|
-- | -0.714 | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -0.457 | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -0.494 | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -1.072 | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -2.098 | -- | -- |
|
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
|
-- | -1.426 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SKF
ProShares UltraShort Financials
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Short Financials vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SEF or BZQ?
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Short Financials's net margin of --. ProShares Short Financials's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SEF or BZQ?
ProShares Short Financials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Short Financials has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped, analysts believe ProShares Short Financials is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEFProShares Short Financials0 0 0 BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped0 0 0 -
Is SEF or BZQ More Risky?
ProShares Short Financials has a beta of -1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 202.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has a beta of -1.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 283.525%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEF or BZQ?
ProShares Short Financials has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.43%. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped offers a yield of 6.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. ProShares Short Financials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEF or BZQ?
ProShares Short Financials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Short Financials's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Short Financials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Short Financials is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- -- BZQProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SEF or FXP?
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Short Financials's net margin of --. ProShares Short Financials's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SEF or FXP?
ProShares Short Financials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Short Financials has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50, analysts believe ProShares Short Financials is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEFProShares Short Financials0 0 0 FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 500 0 0 -
Is SEF or FXP More Risky?
ProShares Short Financials has a beta of -1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 202.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 193.924%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEF or FXP?
ProShares Short Financials has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.43%. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 offers a yield of 10.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. ProShares Short Financials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEF or FXP?
ProShares Short Financials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Short Financials's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Short Financials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Short Financials is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- -- FXPProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SEF or MYY?
ProShares Short MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Short Financials's net margin of --. ProShares Short Financials's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Short MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- MYYProShares Short MidCap400-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SEF or MYY?
ProShares Short Financials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Short MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Short Financials has higher upside potential than ProShares Short MidCap400, analysts believe ProShares Short Financials is more attractive than ProShares Short MidCap400.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEFProShares Short Financials0 0 0 MYYProShares Short MidCap4000 0 0 -
Is SEF or MYY More Risky?
ProShares Short Financials has a beta of -1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 202.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Short MidCap400 has a beta of -1.114, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.423%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEF or MYY?
ProShares Short Financials has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.43%. ProShares Short MidCap400 offers a yield of 4.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. ProShares Short Financials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Short MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEF or MYY?
ProShares Short Financials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Short MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Short Financials's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Short MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Short Financials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Short MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Short Financials is -- versus -- for ProShares Short MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- -- MYYProShares Short MidCap400-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SEF or MZZ?
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Short Financials's net margin of --. ProShares Short Financials's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap400-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SEF or MZZ?
ProShares Short Financials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Short Financials has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400, analysts believe ProShares Short Financials is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEFProShares Short Financials0 0 0 MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap4000 0 0 -
Is SEF or MZZ More Risky?
ProShares Short Financials has a beta of -1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 202.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has a beta of -2.234, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 323.399%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEF or MZZ?
ProShares Short Financials has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.43%. ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 offers a yield of 5.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. ProShares Short Financials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEF or MZZ?
ProShares Short Financials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Short Financials's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Short Financials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Short Financials is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- -- MZZProShares UltraShort MidCap400-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SEF or SKF?
ProShares UltraShort Financials has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares Short Financials's net margin of --. ProShares Short Financials's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort Financials's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- SKFProShares UltraShort Financials-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SEF or SKF?
ProShares Short Financials has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort Financials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares Short Financials has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort Financials, analysts believe ProShares Short Financials is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort Financials.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEFProShares Short Financials0 0 0 SKFProShares UltraShort Financials0 0 0 -
Is SEF or SKF More Risky?
ProShares Short Financials has a beta of -1.022, which suggesting that the stock is 202.217% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort Financials has a beta of -2.053, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 305.312%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEF or SKF?
ProShares Short Financials has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.43%. ProShares UltraShort Financials offers a yield of 5.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. ProShares Short Financials pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort Financials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEF or SKF?
ProShares Short Financials quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort Financials quarterly revenues of --. ProShares Short Financials's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort Financials's net income of --. Notably, ProShares Short Financials's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort Financials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares Short Financials is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort Financials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEFProShares Short Financials-- -- -- -- SKFProShares UltraShort Financials-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
64
RGC alert for Jan 6
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 22.74% over the past day.
Buy
73
INOD alert for Jan 6
Innodata, Inc. [INOD] is up 4.84% over the past day.
Buy
65
AVAV alert for Jan 6
AeroVironment, Inc. [AVAV] is up 6.62% over the past day.
