Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Sell
33
PULS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$49.80
Seasonality move
:
0.03%
Day range:
$49.80 - $49.81
52-week range:
$49.34 - $49.84
Dividend yield:
4.81%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.8M
Avg. volume:
2.2M
1-year change:
0.1%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
$49.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 4.81% | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
$50.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 4.32% | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
$75.31 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 4.6% | -- |
|
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
$50.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 4.17% | -- |
|
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF
|
$50.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 4.04% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.002 | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -0.012 | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | 0.025 | -- | -- |
|
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -0.029 | -- | -- |
|
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF
|
-- | -0.009 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TFLO
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PULS or DUSB?
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PULS or DUSB?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF, analysts believe PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is PULS or DUSB More Risky?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.048, which suggesting that the stock is 95.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PULS or DUSB?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PULS or DUSB?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- DUSBDimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PULS or RAVI?
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PULS or RAVI?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund, analysts believe PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is PULS or RAVI More Risky?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.048, which suggesting that the stock is 95.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has a beta of 0.073, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.73%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PULS or RAVI?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund offers a yield of 4.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PULS or RAVI?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PULS or TFLO?
iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- TFLOiShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PULS or TFLO?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF, analysts believe PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 TFLOiShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is PULS or TFLO More Risky?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.048, which suggesting that the stock is 95.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.014, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.612%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PULS or TFLO?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PULS or TFLO?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- TFLOiShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PULS or XHLF?
BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's net margin of --. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- XHLFBondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PULS or XHLF?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has higher upside potential than BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF, analysts believe PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF is more attractive than BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF0 0 0 XHLFBondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF0 0 0 -
Is PULS or XHLF More Risky?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a beta of 0.048, which suggesting that the stock is 95.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PULS or XHLF?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.81%. BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PULS or XHLF?
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF quarterly revenues of --. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF's net income of --. Notably, PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF is -- versus -- for BondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PULSPGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF-- -- -- -- XHLFBondBloxx Bloomberg 6 Mo Tgt Duration US Trsy ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 18.81% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 30
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.
