Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
43
PSIL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.74
Seasonality move
:
-18.78%
Day range:
$16.72 - $17.21
52-week range:
$9.58 - $21.61
Dividend yield:
11.01%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
16.6K
Avg. volume:
15.9K
1-year change:
33.97%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
|
$17.07 | -- | -- | -- | $1.68 | 11.01% | -- |
|
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
|
$23.75 | -- | -- | -- | $10.71 | 0% | -- |
|
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
|
$3.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs
|
$58.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 1.08% | -- |
|
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
|
$2.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
|
-- | 1.975 | -- | -- |
|
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
|
-- | 0.642 | -- | -- |
|
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
|
-- | 0.810 | -- | -- |
|
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs
|
-- | 0.390 | -- | -- |
|
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
|
-- | 1.710 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCU
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PSIL or CNBS?
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's net margin of --. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF-- -- -- CNBSAmplify Seymour Cannabis ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PSIL or CNBS?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF, analysts believe AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF is more attractive than Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF0 0 0 CNBSAmplify Seymour Cannabis ETF0 0 0 -
Is PSIL or CNBS More Risky?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.43%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSIL or CNBS?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.71 per share. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PSIL or CNBS?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF quarterly revenues of --. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF's net income of --. Notably, AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF-- -- -- -- CNBSAmplify Seymour Cannabis ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PSIL or MSOS?
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's net margin of --. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's return on equity of -- beat AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF-- -- -- MSOSAdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PSIL or MSOS?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has higher upside potential than AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF, analysts believe AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF is more attractive than AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF0 0 0 MSOSAdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF0 0 0 -
Is PSIL or MSOS More Risky?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.813%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSIL or MSOS?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PSIL or MSOS?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF quarterly revenues of --. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's net income of -- is lower than AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF's net income of --. Notably, AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF is -- versus -- for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF-- -- -- -- MSOSAdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PSIL or PSCU?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs has a net margin of -- compared to AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's net margin of --. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF-- -- -- PSCUInvesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PSIL or PSCU?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs, analysts believe AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF0 0 0 PSCUInvesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs0 0 0 -
Is PSIL or PSCU More Risky?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.798%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSIL or PSCU?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PSIL or PSCU?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs quarterly revenues of --. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs's net income of --. Notably, AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF-- -- -- -- PSCUInvesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Comm Svcs-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PSIL or YOLO?
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF has a net margin of -- compared to AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's net margin of --. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's return on equity of -- beat AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF-- -- -- YOLOAdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PSIL or YOLO?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has higher upside potential than AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF, analysts believe AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF is more attractive than AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF0 0 0 YOLOAdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF0 0 0 -
Is PSIL or YOLO More Risky?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.183%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSIL or YOLO?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.01%. AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PSIL or YOLO?
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF quarterly revenues of --. AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's net income of -- is lower than AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF's net income of --. Notably, AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF is -- versus -- for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF-- -- -- -- YOLOAdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
54
AAOI alert for Feb 28
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 56.96% over the past day.
Buy
90
BNAI alert for Feb 28
Brand Engagement Network, Inc. [BNAI] is up 36.02% over the past day.
Sell
36
WLDN alert for Feb 28
Willdan Group, Inc. [WLDN] is down 25.56% over the past day.
