Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Sell
21
PHDG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$37.85
Seasonality move
:
3.4%
Day range:
$38.03 - $38.15
52-week range:
$33.48 - $39.40
Dividend yield:
2.02%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
14.1K
Avg. volume:
14.1K
1-year change:
12.4%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLSP
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GTR
WisdomTree Target Range Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MSTB
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
|
$38.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 2.02% | -- |
|
FLSP
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF
|
$23.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 1.19% | -- |
|
GTR
WisdomTree Target Range Fund
|
$24.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.52 | 3.6% | -- |
|
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
|
$45.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 0.94% | -- |
|
MSTB
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
|
$34.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
|
-- | 0.849 | -- | -- |
|
FLSP
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF
|
-- | 0.279 | -- | -- |
|
GTR
WisdomTree Target Range Fund
|
-- | 0.761 | -- | -- |
|
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
|
-- | 1.063 | -- | -- |
|
MSTB
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
|
-- | 1.094 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PHDG
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLSP
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GTR
WisdomTree Target Range Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MSTB
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PHDG or FLSP?
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF-- -- -- FLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PHDG or FLSP?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF is more attractive than Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF0 0 0 FLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF0 0 0 -
Is PHDG or FLSP More Risky?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a beta of 0.324, which suggesting that the stock is 67.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PHDG or FLSP?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PHDG or FLSP?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF-- -- -- -- FLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PHDG or GTR?
WisdomTree Target Range Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree Target Range Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF-- -- -- GTRWisdomTree Target Range Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PHDG or GTR?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree Target Range Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree Target Range Fund, analysts believe Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree Target Range Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF0 0 0 GTRWisdomTree Target Range Fund0 0 0 -
Is PHDG or GTR More Risky?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a beta of 0.324, which suggesting that the stock is 67.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree Target Range Fund has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PHDG or GTR?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. WisdomTree Target Range Fund offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree Target Range Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PHDG or GTR?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree Target Range Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree Target Range Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree Target Range Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree Target Range Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF-- -- -- -- GTRWisdomTree Target Range Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PHDG or HTUS?
Hull Tactical US ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hull Tactical US ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF-- -- -- HTUSHull Tactical US ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PHDG or HTUS?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hull Tactical US ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has higher upside potential than Hull Tactical US ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF is more attractive than Hull Tactical US ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF0 0 0 HTUSHull Tactical US ETF0 0 0 -
Is PHDG or HTUS More Risky?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a beta of 0.324, which suggesting that the stock is 67.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hull Tactical US ETF has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.463%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PHDG or HTUS?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Hull Tactical US ETF offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hull Tactical US ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PHDG or HTUS?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hull Tactical US ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hull Tactical US ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hull Tactical US ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF is -- versus -- for Hull Tactical US ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF-- -- -- -- HTUSHull Tactical US ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PHDG or MSTB?
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's net margin of --. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's return on equity of -- beat LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF-- -- -- MSTBLHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PHDG or MSTB?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has higher upside potential than LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF, analysts believe Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF is more attractive than LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF0 0 0 MSTBLHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF0 0 0 -
Is PHDG or MSTB More Risky?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a beta of 0.324, which suggesting that the stock is 67.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PHDG or MSTB?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PHDG or MSTB?
Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's net income of -- is lower than LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF is -- versus -- for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PHDGInvesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF-- -- -- -- MSTBLHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
52
TSLL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
73
PSIX alert for Dec 24
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Sell
31
SOXL alert for Dec 24
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 11.87% over the past day.
