PFUT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Renaissance IPO ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Putnam Sustainable Future ETF's net margin of --. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF's return on equity of -- beat Renaissance IPO ETF's return on equity of --.

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Renaissance IPO ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Putnam Sustainable Future ETF has higher upside potential than Renaissance IPO ETF, analysts believe Putnam Sustainable Future ETF is more attractive than Renaissance IPO ETF.

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renaissance IPO ETF has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.994%.

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Renaissance IPO ETF offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Renaissance IPO ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renaissance IPO ETF quarterly revenues of --. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF's net income of -- is lower than Renaissance IPO ETF's net income of --. Notably, Putnam Sustainable Future ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Renaissance IPO ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF is -- versus -- for Renaissance IPO ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Putnam Sustainable Future ETF's net margin of --. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF's return on equity of --.

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Putnam Sustainable Future ETF has higher upside potential than American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF, analysts believe Putnam Sustainable Future ETF is more attractive than American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF.

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.617%.

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF offers a yield of 0.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF quarterly revenues of --. Putnam Sustainable Future ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF's net income of --. Notably, Putnam Sustainable Future ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF is -- versus -- for American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.