Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Sell
49
PBW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.78
Seasonality move
:
-1.32%
Day range:
$19.01 - $20.30
52-week range:
$17.52 - $30.94
Dividend yield:
2.75%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
301.5K
Avg. volume:
329.5K
1-year change:
-29.97%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBE
Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
$20.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 2.75% | -- |
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
$26.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.09% | -- |
|
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
|
$60.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.73% | -- |
|
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
|
$11.67 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 3.08% | -- |
|
PBE
Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF
|
$67.22 | -- | -- | -- | $0.01 | 0.05% | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
$33.54 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | 2.090 | -- | -- |
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | 2.264 | -- | -- |
|
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
|
-- | 2.223 | -- | -- |
|
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.559 | -- | -- |
|
PBE
Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF
|
-- | 1.301 | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | 2.527 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBD
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBE
Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or ACES?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat ALPS Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or ACES?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS Clean Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than ALPS Clean Energy ETF, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than ALPS Clean Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBW or ACES More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.475, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.486%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or ACES?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. ALPS Clean Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS Clean Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or ACES?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS Clean Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for ALPS Clean Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or CNRG?
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- CNRGSPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or CNRG?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 CNRGSPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBW or CNRG More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.293%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or CNRG?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or CNRG?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- CNRGSPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or PBD?
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- PBDInvesco Global Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or PBD?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 PBDInvesco Global Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBW or PBD More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.446, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.623%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or PBD?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or PBD?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- PBDInvesco Global Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or PBE?
Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- PBEInvesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or PBE?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 PBEInvesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBW or PBE More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.07%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or PBE?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF offers a yield of 0.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or PBE?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- PBEInvesco Biotechnology & Genome ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or TAN?
Invesco Solar ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or TAN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Solar ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Solar ETF, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than Invesco Solar ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBW or TAN More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.175% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or TAN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Invesco Solar ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Solar ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or TAN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Solar ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Solar ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Solar ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
40
MSTR alert for Dec 24
MicroStrategy [MSTR] is up 8.05% over the past day.
Sell
26
NUTX alert for Dec 24
Nutex Health [NUTX] is down 0.76% over the past day.
Sell
48
VRNA alert for Dec 24
Verona Pharma PLC [VRNA] is down 0.4% over the past day.
