Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
65
PBW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$32.30
Seasonality move
:
3.25%
Day range:
$30.95 - $32.38
52-week range:
$13.19 - $36.52
Dividend yield:
1.01%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
963.5K
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
55.01%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IYZ
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
$32.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 1.01% | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
$19.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.23% | -- |
|
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
$96.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.23% | -- |
|
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
|
$333.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 0.64% | -- |
|
IYZ
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
$46.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.24% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | 2.755 | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.056 | -- | -- |
|
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.585 | -- | -- |
|
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.484 | -- | -- |
|
IYZ
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | 1.821 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IYZ
iShares US Telecommunications ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or FAN?
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or FAN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBW or FAN More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.266%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or FAN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or FAN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or FYC?
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- FYCFirst Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or FYC?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 FYCFirst Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is PBW or FYC More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.719%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or FYC?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or FYC?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- FYCFirst Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or IWO?
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or IWO?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBW or IWO More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.106%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or IWO?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or IWO?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- IWOiShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or IYZ?
iShares US Telecommunications ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US Telecommunications ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- IYZiShares US Telecommunications ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or IYZ?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US Telecommunications ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US Telecommunications ETF, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than iShares US Telecommunications ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 IYZiShares US Telecommunications ETF0 0 0 -
Is PBW or IYZ More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US Telecommunications ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or IYZ?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. iShares US Telecommunications ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US Telecommunications ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or IYZ?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US Telecommunications ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US Telecommunications ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US Telecommunications ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US Telecommunications ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- IYZiShares US Telecommunications ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PBW or QCLN?
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PBW or QCLN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd, analysts believe Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd0 0 0 -
Is PBW or QCLN More Risky?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.591% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd has a beta of 1.493, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.265%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PBW or QCLN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PBW or QCLN?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd quarterly revenues of --. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's net income of --. Notably, Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- QCLNFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Idx Fd-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.
