Where Will ISRG Stock Be in 5 Years?
Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ:ISRG) is the innovative medical tech business behind…
Sell
41
MVPA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$34.25
Seasonality move
:
6.05%
Day range:
$34.58 - $34.68
52-week range:
$26.87 - $37.15
Dividend yield:
0.54%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
204
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
-4.41%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MVPA
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DEEP
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MVPA
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF
|
$34.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.54% | -- |
|
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
|
$28.18 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
DEEP
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
|
$38.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.67% | -- |
|
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
|
$49.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 1.99% | -- |
|
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
|
$45.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.1% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MVPA
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF
|
-- | 1.116 | -- | -- |
|
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DEEP
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
|
-- | 0.957 | -- | -- |
|
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.768 | -- | -- |
|
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
|
-- | 1.015 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MVPA
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCFE
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DEEP
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MVPA or CCFE?
Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's net margin of --. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF-- -- -- CCFEConcourse Capital Focused Equity ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MVPA or CCFE?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has higher upside potential than Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF, analysts believe Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF is more attractive than Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF0 0 0 CCFEConcourse Capital Focused Equity ETF0 0 0 -
Is MVPA or CCFE More Risky?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MVPA or CCFE?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MVPA or CCFE?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF quarterly revenues of --. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF's net income of --. Notably, Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF is -- versus -- for Concourse Capital Focused Equity ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF-- -- -- -- CCFEConcourse Capital Focused Equity ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MVPA or DEEP?
Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's net margin of --. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF-- -- -- DEEPAcquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MVPA or DEEP?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has higher upside potential than Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF, analysts believe Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF is more attractive than Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF0 0 0 DEEPAcquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF0 0 0 -
Is MVPA or DEEP More Risky?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.264%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MVPA or DEEP?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MVPA or DEEP?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF quarterly revenues of --. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF's net income of --. Notably, Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF is -- versus -- for Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF-- -- -- -- DEEPAcquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MVPA or ROSC?
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's net margin of --. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF-- -- -- ROSCHartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MVPA or ROSC?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has higher upside potential than Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF, analysts believe Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF is more attractive than Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF0 0 0 ROSCHartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is MVPA or ROSC More Risky?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF has a beta of 0.929, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MVPA or ROSC?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MVPA or ROSC?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF is -- versus -- for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF-- -- -- -- ROSCHartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MVPA or SQLV?
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's net margin of --. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's return on equity of -- beat Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF-- -- -- SQLVRoyce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MVPA or SQLV?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has higher upside potential than Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF, analysts believe Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF is more attractive than Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF0 0 0 SQLVRoyce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF0 0 0 -
Is MVPA or SQLV More Risky?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.795%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MVPA or SQLV?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MVPA or SQLV?
Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF quarterly revenues of --. Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's net income of -- is lower than Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF's net income of --. Notably, Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF is -- versus -- for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MVPAMiller Value Partners Appreciation ETF-- -- -- -- SQLVRoyce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Kratos Stock a Good Investment?
UAV and hypersonic system defense contractor Kratos (NASDAQ:KTOS) has swung…
Is Palantir Stock Going to Crash?
AI and data analytics major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has become something…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Sell
50
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
52
CVLT alert for Jan 27
Commvault Systems, Inc. [CVLT] is down 31.22% over the past day.
Buy
73
BNAI alert for Jan 27
Brand Engagement Network, Inc. [BNAI] is down 16.85% over the past day.
Buy
71
SANM alert for Jan 27
Sanmina Corp. [SANM] is down 21.58% over the past day.
