MLPA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure's return on equity of --.

Global X MLP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure, analysts believe Global X MLP ETF is more attractive than First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure.

Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.784% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.463%.

Global X MLP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.18%. First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure offers a yield of 3.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Global X MLP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of -- beat ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.

Global X MLP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP ETF has higher upside potential than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP ETF is more attractive than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF.

Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.784% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.513%.

Global X MLP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.18%. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Global X MLP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP ETF's net income of -- is lower than ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP ETF is -- versus -- for ALPS Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of -- beat Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s return on equity of --.

Global X MLP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP ETF has higher upside potential than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,, analysts believe Global X MLP ETF is more attractive than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,.

Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.784% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, has a beta of 1.734, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.374%.

Global X MLP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.18%. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, offers a yield of 6.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Global X MLP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund, quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP ETF's net income of -- is lower than Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP ETF is -- versus -- for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund,. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF's return on equity of --.

Global X MLP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP ETF has higher upside potential than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP ETF is more attractive than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF.

Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.784% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.911%.

Global X MLP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.18%. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Global X MLP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP ETF is -- versus -- for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.