MLPA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of -- beat Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's return on equity of --.

Global X MLP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP ETF has higher upside potential than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund, analysts believe Global X MLP ETF is more attractive than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund.

Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 0.546, which suggesting that the stock is 45.371% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.004%.

Global X MLP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.63%. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Global X MLP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP ETF's net income of -- is lower than Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP ETF is -- versus -- for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacer American Energy Independence ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer American Energy Independence ETF's return on equity of --.

Global X MLP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer American Energy Independence ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer American Energy Independence ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP ETF is more attractive than Pacer American Energy Independence ETF.

Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 0.546, which suggesting that the stock is 45.371% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer American Energy Independence ETF has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.233%.

Global X MLP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.63%. Pacer American Energy Independence ETF offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Global X MLP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer American Energy Independence ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer American Energy Independence ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer American Energy Independence ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer American Energy Independence ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer American Energy Independence ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF's return on equity of --.

Global X MLP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF.

Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 0.546, which suggesting that the stock is 45.371% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.231%.

Global X MLP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.63%. State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Global X MLP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X MLP ETF's net margin of --. Global X MLP ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF's return on equity of --.

Global X MLP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X MLP ETF has higher upside potential than State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF, analysts believe Global X MLP ETF is more attractive than State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF.

Global X MLP ETF has a beta of 0.546, which suggesting that the stock is 45.371% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.003%.

Global X MLP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.63%. State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Global X MLP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X MLP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X MLP ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X MLP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X MLP ETF is -- versus -- for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.