Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
41
MJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$26.50
Seasonality move
:
-1.44%
Day range:
$25.06 - $27.00
52-week range:
$16.12 - $42.87
Dividend yield:
13.74%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
119.3K
Avg. volume:
73K
1-year change:
-9.27%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MJ
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IPAY
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MJ
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF
|
$27.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 13.74% | -- |
|
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
|
$23.52 | -- | -- | -- | $10.71 | 45.54% | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
$19.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.23% | -- |
|
IPAY
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
|
$51.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 0.86% | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$133.55 | -- | -- | -- | $1.62 | 1.21% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MJ
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF
|
-- | 1.820 | -- | -- |
|
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
|
-- | 0.938 | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.056 | -- | -- |
|
IPAY
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
|
-- | 1.393 | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 0.650 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MJ
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IPAY
Amplify Digital Payments ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MJ or CNBS?
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF-- -- -- CNBSAmplify Seymour Cannabis ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MJ or CNBS?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF, analysts believe Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF is more attractive than Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF0 0 0 CNBSAmplify Seymour Cannabis ETF0 0 0 -
Is MJ or CNBS More Risky?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.035%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MJ or CNBS?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.74%. Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF offers a yield of 45.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.71 per share. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MJ or CNBS?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF-- -- -- -- CNBSAmplify Seymour Cannabis ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MJ or FAN?
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF-- -- -- FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MJ or FAN?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF, analysts believe Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF is more attractive than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF0 0 0 FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is MJ or FAN More Risky?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.266%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MJ or FAN?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.74%. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MJ or FAN?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF-- -- -- -- FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MJ or IPAY?
Amplify Digital Payments ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Digital Payments ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF-- -- -- IPAYAmplify Digital Payments ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MJ or IPAY?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Digital Payments ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Digital Payments ETF, analysts believe Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF is more attractive than Amplify Digital Payments ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF0 0 0 IPAYAmplify Digital Payments ETF0 0 0 -
Is MJ or IPAY More Risky?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Digital Payments ETF has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.864%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MJ or IPAY?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.74%. Amplify Digital Payments ETF offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Digital Payments ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MJ or IPAY?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Digital Payments ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Digital Payments ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Digital Payments ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Digital Payments ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF-- -- -- -- IPAYAmplify Digital Payments ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MJ or SMOG?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF-- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MJ or SMOG?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, analysts believe Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF is more attractive than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF0 0 0 SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is MJ or SMOG More Risky?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a beta of 1.146, which suggesting that the stock is 14.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.148%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MJ or SMOG?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.74%. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MJ or SMOG?
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MJAmplify Alternative Harvest ETF-- -- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 122.86% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 0.5% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is down 0.14% over the past day.
