Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
27
LDRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.46
Seasonality move
:
0.37%
Day range:
$25.32 - $25.42
52-week range:
$24.70 - $26.61
Dividend yield:
4.15%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
40.2K
Avg. volume:
25.6K
1-year change:
0.89%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LDRC
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LDRC
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF
|
$25.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 4.15% | -- |
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
$23.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.64% | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
$25.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 4.89% | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
$25.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.29 | 4.4% | -- |
|
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF
|
$52.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 4.48% | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LDRC
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF
|
-- | 0.221 | -- | -- |
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.244 | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -0.022 | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | 0.172 | -- | -- |
|
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF
|
-- | 0.271 | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LDRC
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LDRC or CBON?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net margin of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LDRC or CBON?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck China Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck China Bond ETF, analysts believe iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is more attractive than VanEck China Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF0 0 0 CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is LDRC or CBON More Risky?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.549, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.077%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LDRC or CBON?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. VanEck China Bond ETF offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck China Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LDRC or CBON?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck China Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck China Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- -- CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LDRC or FLTR?
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net margin of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LDRC or FLTR?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, analysts believe iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is more attractive than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF0 0 0 FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 -
Is LDRC or FLTR More Risky?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.036, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.367%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LDRC or FLTR?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF offers a yield of 4.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LDRC or FLTR?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- -- FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LDRC or IBID?
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net margin of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LDRC or IBID?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has higher upside potential than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF, analysts believe iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is more attractive than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF0 0 0 IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF0 0 0 -
Is LDRC or IBID More Risky?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LDRC or IBID?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LDRC or IBID?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is -- versus -- for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- -- IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LDRC or IGSB?
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net margin of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- IGSBiShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LDRC or IGSB?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has higher upside potential than iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF, analysts believe iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is more attractive than iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF0 0 0 IGSBiShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF0 0 0 -
Is LDRC or IGSB More Risky?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF has a beta of 0.484, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.556%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LDRC or IGSB?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LDRC or IGSB?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is -- versus -- for iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- -- IGSBiShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LDRC or MIG?
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net margin of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's return on equity of -- beat Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LDRC or MIG?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has higher upside potential than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc., analysts believe iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is more attractive than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF0 0 0 MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LDRC or MIG More Risky?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LDRC or MIG?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LDRC or MIG?
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. quarterly revenues of --. iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's net income of -- is lower than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF is -- versus -- for Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LDRCiShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF-- -- -- -- MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 47.98% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is down 31.47% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 28.97% over the past day.
