Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Sell
30
JLQD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$41.34
Seasonality move
:
-2.4%
Day range:
$41.34 - $41.34
52-week range:
$40.18 - $43.22
Dividend yield:
5.33%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-0.07%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JLQD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JLQD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
|
$41.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 5.33% | -- |
|
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF
|
$44.43 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 5.26% | -- |
|
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
|
$35.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 5.24% | -- |
|
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
|
$20.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 5.05% | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JLQD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.906 | -- | -- |
|
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF
|
-- | 1.082 | -- | -- |
|
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.963 | -- | -- |
|
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.043 | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
JLQD
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JHCB
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns JLQD or BBCB?
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's net margin of --. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- BBCBJPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JLQD or BBCB?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF, analysts believe Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF is more attractive than JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF0 0 0 BBCBJPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF0 0 0 -
Is JLQD or BBCB More Risky?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.064%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JLQD or BBCB?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JLQD or BBCB?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF quarterly revenues of --. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF's net income of --. Notably, Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- BBCBJPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Inv Gr Corp Bd ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JLQD or EYEG?
AB Corporate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's net margin of --. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat AB Corporate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- EYEGAB Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JLQD or EYEG?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AB Corporate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than AB Corporate Bond ETF, analysts believe Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF is more attractive than AB Corporate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF0 0 0 EYEGAB Corporate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is JLQD or EYEG More Risky?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AB Corporate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JLQD or EYEG?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. AB Corporate Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AB Corporate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JLQD or EYEG?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AB Corporate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than AB Corporate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AB Corporate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for AB Corporate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- EYEGAB Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JLQD or JHCB?
John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's net margin of --. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- JHCBJohn Hancock Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JLQD or JHCB?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF, analysts believe Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF is more attractive than John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF0 0 0 JHCBJohn Hancock Corporate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is JLQD or JHCB More Risky?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JLQD or JHCB?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JLQD or JHCB?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- JHCBJohn Hancock Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns JLQD or MIG?
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's net margin of --. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About JLQD or MIG?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc., analysts believe Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF is more attractive than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF0 0 0 MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.0 0 0 -
Is JLQD or MIG More Risky?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock JLQD or MIG?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.33%. Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios JLQD or MIG?
Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income JLQDJanus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
