Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
56
HAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$70.50
Seasonality move
:
1.46%
Day range:
$71.15 - $72.20
52-week range:
$42.65 - $74.45
Dividend yield:
1.9%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
38.4K
Avg. volume:
38K
1-year change:
51.78%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GUNR
FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
$71.91 | -- | -- | -- | $1.36 | 1.9% | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
$46.74 | -- | -- | -- | $4.55 | 9.73% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$30.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.72 | 2.34% | -- |
|
GUNR
FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd
|
$54.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 2.38% | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
$95.80 | -- | -- | -- | $1.32 | 1.37% | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
$45.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 1.98% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | 0.105 | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.526 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.354 | -- | -- |
|
GUNR
FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd
|
-- | 0.083 | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | 0.575 | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | 0.311 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GUNR
FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VEGI
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or COPJ?
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or COPJ?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or COPJ More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.187% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or COPJ?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 9.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.55 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or COPJ?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- COPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or CUT?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or CUT More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.187% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.727%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or CUT?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or CUT?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or GUNR?
FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- GUNRFlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or GUNR?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 GUNRFlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd0 0 0 -
Is HAP or GUNR More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.187% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.218%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or GUNR?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or GUNR?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- GUNRFlexShs Morningstar Glbl Upsteam Ntrl Res Idx Fd-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or SLX?
VanEck Steel ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or SLX?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Steel ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Steel ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than VanEck Steel ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or SLX More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.187% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.621%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or SLX?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. VanEck Steel ETF offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Steel ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or SLX?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Steel ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Steel ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Steel ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or VEGI?
iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or VEGI?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or VEGI More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.187% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.113%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or VEGI?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.9%. iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or VEGI?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- VEGIiShares MSCI Agriculture Producers ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
42
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
93
NBTX alert for Mar 5
Nanobiotix SA [NBTX] is down 6.21% over the past day.
Sell
45
MRNA alert for Mar 5
Moderna, Inc. [MRNA] is down 7.73% over the past day.
Buy
77
SSRM alert for Mar 5
SSR Mining, Inc. [SSRM] is down 8.24% over the past day.
