Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
28
GVIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$147.44
Seasonality move
:
0.64%
Day range:
$150.73 - $152.14
52-week range:
$100.33 - $163.42
Dividend yield:
0.35%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.6K
Avg. volume:
13.8K
1-year change:
29.86%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCHG
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
|
$147.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.52 | 0.35% | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
$155.09 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.21% | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
$87.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0.57% | -- |
|
SCHG
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF
|
$29.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.39% | -- |
|
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
|
$49.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.62% | -- |
|
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
$101.09 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.55% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
|
-- | 1.316 | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.092 | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | 1.502 | -- | -- |
|
SCHG
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.389 | -- | -- |
|
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
|
-- | 1.339 | -- | -- |
|
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.416 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCHG
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GVIP or FTC?
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GVIP or FTC?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is more attractive than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF0 0 0 FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is GVIP or FTC More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.974%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GVIP or FTC?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GVIP or FTC?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- -- FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GVIP or ONEQ?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GVIP or ONEQ?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF0 0 0 ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is GVIP or ONEQ More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.533%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GVIP or ONEQ?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GVIP or ONEQ?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- -- ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GVIP or SCHG?
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's return on equity of -- beat Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- SCHGSchwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GVIP or SCHG?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has higher upside potential than Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is more attractive than Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF0 0 0 SCHGSchwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is GVIP or SCHG More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.836%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GVIP or SCHG?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GVIP or SCHG?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net income of -- is lower than Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is -- versus -- for Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- -- SCHGSchwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GVIP or SPUS?
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's return on equity of -- beat SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GVIP or SPUS?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has higher upside potential than SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is more attractive than SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF0 0 0 SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF0 0 0 -
Is GVIP or SPUS More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.289%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GVIP or SPUS?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GVIP or SPUS?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net income of -- is lower than SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is -- versus -- for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- -- SPUSSP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GVIP or SPYG?
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- SPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GVIP or SPYG?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF0 0 0 SPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is GVIP or SPYG More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a beta of 1.028, which suggesting that the stock is 2.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.364%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GVIP or SPYG?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GVIP or SPYG?
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GVIPGoldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF-- -- -- -- SPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
92
APEI alert for Mar 13
American Public Education, Inc. [APEI] is up 26.24% over the past day.
Buy
52
PZZA alert for Mar 13
Papa John's International, Inc. [PZZA] is down 5.25% over the past day.
Buy
53
NBIS alert for Mar 13
Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 0.87% over the past day.
