Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
50
GMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$135.69
Seasonality move
:
2.93%
Day range:
$134.11 - $135.75
52-week range:
$100.11 - $151.54
Dividend yield:
1.52%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
5.7K
Avg. volume:
12K
1-year change:
16.76%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
$135.74 | -- | -- | -- | $1.20 | 1.52% | -- |
|
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
|
$105.58 | -- | -- | -- | $1.56 | 3.03% | -- |
|
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
|
$53.56 | -- | -- | -- | $1.05 | 3.56% | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
$49.55 | -- | -- | -- | $0.60 | 3.25% | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
$43.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 2.71% | -- |
|
SPEM
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
$46.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.77 | 2.78% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | 0.767 | -- | -- |
|
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
|
-- | 0.396 | -- | -- |
|
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
|
-- | 0.759 | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | 1.050 | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | 0.795 | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | 0.716 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EDEN?
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF has a net margin of -- compared to State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Denmark ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EDENiShares MSCI Denmark ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EDEN?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Denmark ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Denmark ETF, analysts believe State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Denmark ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EDENiShares MSCI Denmark ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EDEN More Risky?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Denmark ETF has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.802%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EDEN?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. iShares MSCI Denmark ETF offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Denmark ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EDEN?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Denmark ETF quarterly revenues of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Denmark ETF's net income of --. Notably, State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EDENiShares MSCI Denmark ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EPP?
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EPPiShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EPP?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF, analysts believe State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EPPiShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EPP More Risky?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.048%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EPP?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF offers a yield of 3.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EPP?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF quarterly revenues of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF's net income of --. Notably, State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EPPiShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EWD?
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has a net margin of -- compared to State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EWD?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF, analysts believe State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EWD More Risky?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has a beta of 1.329, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.945%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EWD?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. iShares MSCI Sweden ETF offers a yield of 3.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Sweden ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EWD?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF quarterly revenues of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's net income of --. Notably, State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EWQ?
iShares MSCI France ETF has a net margin of -- compared to State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI France ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EWQ?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI France ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI France ETF, analysts believe State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI France ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EWQiShares MSCI France ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EWQ More Risky?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI France ETF has a beta of 1.098, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.796%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EWQ?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. iShares MSCI France ETF offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI France ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EWQ?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI France ETF quarterly revenues of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI France ETF's net income of --. Notably, State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI France ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI France ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or SPEM?
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has a net margin of -- compared to State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- SPEMState Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or SPEM?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF, analysts believe State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 SPEMState Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or SPEM More Risky?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.776% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has a beta of 0.828, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.206%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or SPEM?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.52%. State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or SPEM?
State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF quarterly revenues of --. State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's net income of --. Notably, State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- SPEMState Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 5
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 5
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 5
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
