Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
36
GMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$139.10
Seasonality move
:
-0.67%
Day range:
$138.33 - $139.16
52-week range:
$100.11 - $144.30
Dividend yield:
1.76%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
16.1K
Avg. volume:
8.9K
1-year change:
16.73%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
$138.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.86 | 1.76% | -- |
|
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
|
$111.98 | -- | -- | -- | $1.63 | 1.78% | -- |
|
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
|
$51.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.86 | 3.57% | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
$44.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.95 | 2.74% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$99.31 | -- | -- | -- | $1.00 | 2.52% | -- |
|
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
$46.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 2.43% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | 0.620 | -- | -- |
|
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
|
-- | 1.663 | -- | -- |
|
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
|
-- | 1.342 | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | 0.865 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.351 | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | 0.718 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMF
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EDEN
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EDEN?
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Denmark ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EDENiShares MSCI Denmark ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EDEN?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Denmark ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Denmark ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Denmark ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EDENiShares MSCI Denmark ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EDEN More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Denmark ETF has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EDEN?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. iShares MSCI Denmark ETF offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Denmark ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EDEN?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Denmark ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Denmark ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EDENiShares MSCI Denmark ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EPP?
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EPPiShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EPP?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EPPiShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EPP More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.369%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EPP?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EPP?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EPPiShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or EWQ?
iShares MSCI France ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI France ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or EWQ?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI France ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI France ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI France ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 EWQiShares MSCI France ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or EWQ More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI France ETF has a beta of 1.154, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.447%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or EWQ?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. iShares MSCI France ETF offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI France ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or EWQ?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI France ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI France ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI France ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI France ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or GXC?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or GXC More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.99%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or GXC?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or GXC?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMF or SPEM?
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- SPEMSPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMF or SPEM?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is more attractive than SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF0 0 0 SPEMSPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF0 0 0 -
Is GMF or SPEM More Risky?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a beta of 0.856, which suggesting that the stock is 14.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMF or SPEM?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMF or SPEM?
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMFSPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF-- -- -- -- SPEMSPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.
