Financhill
Sell
35

GCAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$50.81
Seasonality move :
-0.42%
Day range:
$50.80 - $50.91
52-week range:
$47.72 - $51.16
Dividend yield:
3.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
52.2K
Avg. volume:
12.9K
1-year change:
-0.36%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
-- -- -- -- --
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
-- -- -- -- --
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
-- -- -- -- --
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
-- -- -- -- --
VTEC
Valtech SE
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
$50.81 -- -- -- $0.14 3.03% --
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
$24.96 -- -- -- $0.07 2.9% --
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
$50.06 -- -- -- $0.14 3.36% --
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
$50.14 -- -- -- $0.10 2.88% --
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
$21.81 -- -- -- $0.06 3.35% --
VTEC
Valtech SE
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
-- 0.840 -- --
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
-- 1.146 -- --
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
-- 1.065 -- --
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
-- 0.607 -- --
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
-- 0.786 -- --
VTEC
Valtech SE
-- 0.000 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CA
Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
VTEC
Valtech SE
-- -- -- -- -- --

Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GCAL or CA?

    Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- --
    CA
    Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GCAL or CA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    0 0 0
    CA
    Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GCAL or CA More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or CA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or CA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- -- --
    CA
    Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GCAL or CATF?

    American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- --
    CATF
    American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GCAL or CATF?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    0 0 0
    CATF
    American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GCAL or CATF More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or CATF?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. American Century California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or CATF?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- -- --
    CATF
    American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GCAL or DFCA?

    DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- --
    DFCA
    DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GCAL or DFCA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    0 0 0
    DFCA
    DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GCAL or DFCA More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or DFCA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or DFCA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- -- --
    DFCA
    DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GCAL or MMCA?

    NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- --
    MMCA
    NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GCAL or MMCA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    0 0 0
    MMCA
    NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is GCAL or MMCA More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or MMCA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or MMCA?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- -- --
    MMCA
    NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GCAL or VTEC?

    Valtech SE has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat Valtech SE's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- --
    VTEC
    Valtech SE
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GCAL or VTEC?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valtech SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than Valtech SE, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than Valtech SE.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    0 0 0
    VTEC
    Valtech SE
    0 0 0
  • Is GCAL or VTEC More Risky?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valtech SE has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or VTEC?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Valtech SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valtech SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or VTEC?

    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valtech SE quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than Valtech SE's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Valtech SE's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for Valtech SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GCAL
    Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
    -- -- -- --
    VTEC
    Valtech SE
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?

Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…

Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?

Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.

Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6

Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.

Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6

Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock