How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Sell
12
GCAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.14
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$50.14 - $50.14
52-week range:
$49.95 - $51.11
Dividend yield:
1.13%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMNY
Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RMCA
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
$50.14 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.13% | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$49.72 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.33% | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$49.92 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 2.87% | -- |
|
GMNY
Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF
|
$50.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 1.15% | -- |
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
$21.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 3.79% | -- |
|
RMCA
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF
|
$24.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.86% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.554 | -- | -- |
|
GMNY
Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | 0.814 | -- | -- |
|
RMCA
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GCAL
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DFCA
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMNY
Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MMCA
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RMCA
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or CATF?
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or CATF?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or CATF More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or CATF?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. American Century California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or CATF?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- CATFAmerican Century California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or DFCA?
DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or DFCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or DFCA More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or DFCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or DFCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for DFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- DFCADFA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or GMNY?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- GMNYGoldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or GMNY?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 GMNYGoldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or GMNY More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or GMNY?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or GMNY?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for Goldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- GMNYGoldman Sachs Dynamic New York MunicipalETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or MMCA?
NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or MMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or MMCA More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or MMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or MMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- MMCANYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GCAL or RMCA?
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net margin of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's return on equity of -- beat Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- RMCARockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GCAL or RMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has higher upside potential than Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF, analysts believe Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is more attractive than Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF0 0 0 RMCARockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is GCAL or RMCA More Risky?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GCAL or RMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GCAL or RMCA?
Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's net income of -- is lower than Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF is -- versus -- for Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GCALGoldman Sachs Dynamic California MunicipalETF-- -- -- -- RMCARockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF-- -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
57
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
64
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
64
QMCO alert for Dec 27
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
65
ALGS alert for Dec 27
Aligos Therapeutics [ALGS] is up 10.88% over the past day.
