Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
67
FNDX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.27
Seasonality move
:
1.84%
Day range:
$27.19 - $27.36
52-week range:
$20.41 - $27.36
Dividend yield:
1.6%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
5.2M
Avg. volume:
6.7M
1-year change:
9.43%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VALQ
American Century US Quality Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF
|
$27.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.6% | -- |
|
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
|
$57.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 3.02% | -- |
|
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
|
$71.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 1.43% | -- |
|
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
|
$81.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 1.66% | -- |
|
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
|
$28.71 | -- | -- | -- | $0.47 | 1.63% | -- |
|
VALQ
American Century US Quality Value ETF
|
$66.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.8% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF
|
-- | 0.821 | -- | -- |
|
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
|
-- | 0.704 | -- | -- |
|
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.958 | -- | -- |
|
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
|
-- | 0.936 | -- | -- |
|
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | 0.771 | -- | -- |
|
VALQ
American Century US Quality Value ETF
|
-- | 0.672 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VALQ
American Century US Quality Value ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FNDX or FDVV?
Fidelity High Dividend ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net margin of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity High Dividend ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNDX or FDVV?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity High Dividend ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity High Dividend ETF, analysts believe Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is more attractive than Fidelity High Dividend ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF0 0 0 FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF0 0 0 -
Is FNDX or FDVV More Risky?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity High Dividend ETF has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.033%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNDX or FDVV?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Fidelity High Dividend ETF offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity High Dividend ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNDX or FDVV?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity High Dividend ETF quarterly revenues of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity High Dividend ETF's net income of --. Notably, Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity High Dividend ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity High Dividend ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- -- FDVVFidelity High Dividend ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNDX or FVAL?
Fidelity Value Factor ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net margin of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's return on equity of -- beat Fidelity Value Factor ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- FVALFidelity Value Factor ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNDX or FVAL?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fidelity Value Factor ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has higher upside potential than Fidelity Value Factor ETF, analysts believe Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is more attractive than Fidelity Value Factor ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF0 0 0 FVALFidelity Value Factor ETF0 0 0 -
Is FNDX or FVAL More Risky?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity Value Factor ETF has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.048%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNDX or FVAL?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Fidelity Value Factor ETF offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity Value Factor ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNDX or FVAL?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fidelity Value Factor ETF quarterly revenues of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net income of -- is lower than Fidelity Value Factor ETF's net income of --. Notably, Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fidelity Value Factor ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is -- versus -- for Fidelity Value Factor ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- -- FVALFidelity Value Factor ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNDX or QDF?
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net margin of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- QDFFlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNDX or QDF?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund, analysts believe Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is more attractive than FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF0 0 0 QDFFlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is FNDX or QDF More Risky?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.049%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNDX or QDF?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNDX or QDF?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- -- QDFFlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNDX or REVS?
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net margin of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's return on equity of -- beat Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- REVSColumbia Research Enhanced Value ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNDX or REVS?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has higher upside potential than Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF, analysts believe Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is more attractive than Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF0 0 0 REVSColumbia Research Enhanced Value ETF0 0 0 -
Is FNDX or REVS More Risky?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNDX or REVS?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNDX or REVS?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF quarterly revenues of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net income of -- is lower than Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF's net income of --. Notably, Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is -- versus -- for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- -- REVSColumbia Research Enhanced Value ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FNDX or VALQ?
American Century US Quality Value ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net margin of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century US Quality Value ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- VALQAmerican Century US Quality Value ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FNDX or VALQ?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century US Quality Value ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has higher upside potential than American Century US Quality Value ETF, analysts believe Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is more attractive than American Century US Quality Value ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF0 0 0 VALQAmerican Century US Quality Value ETF0 0 0 -
Is FNDX or VALQ More Risky?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.36% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century US Quality Value ETF has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.466%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FNDX or VALQ?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. American Century US Quality Value ETF offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century US Quality Value ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FNDX or VALQ?
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century US Quality Value ETF quarterly revenues of --. Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century US Quality Value ETF's net income of --. Notably, Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century US Quality Value ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF is -- versus -- for American Century US Quality Value ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FNDXSchwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF-- -- -- -- VALQAmerican Century US Quality Value ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
67
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 5
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
38
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
69
ASTS alert for Dec 5
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 18.25% over the past day.
