Why Did AMD Stock Go Up?
Since January 9th, shares of chipmaker AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) have been…
Buy
74
FMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$59.20
Seasonality move
:
2.06%
Day range:
$58.64 - $59.21
52-week range:
$41.39 - $59.21
Dividend yield:
1.47%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
39.3K
Avg. volume:
44.2K
1-year change:
16.23%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XLB
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XME
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
$59.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 1.47% | -- |
|
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
|
$73.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.52% | -- |
|
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF
|
$33.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.68% | -- |
|
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF
|
$37.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 1.86% | -- |
|
XLB
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
|
$49.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 1.74% | -- |
|
XME
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
|
$131.44 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.3% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | 0.608 | -- | -- |
|
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
|
-- | 0.784 | -- | -- |
|
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF
|
-- | 0.483 | -- | -- |
|
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF
|
-- | 0.602 | -- | -- |
|
XLB
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
|
-- | 0.499 | -- | -- |
|
XME
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
|
-- | 1.521 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHO
Invesco Water Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSPM
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XLB
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XME
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or PHO?
Invesco Water Resources ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Water Resources ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or PHO?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Water Resources ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Water Resources ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than Invesco Water Resources ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or PHO More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 15.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Water Resources ETF has a beta of 1.116, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.627%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or PHO?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Invesco Water Resources ETF offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Water Resources ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or PHO?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Water Resources ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Water Resources ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Water Resources ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Water Resources ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- PHOInvesco Water Resources ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or RSPH?
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or RSPH?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or RSPH More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 15.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.888%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or RSPH?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or RSPH?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Health Care ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or RSPM?
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- RSPMInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or RSPM?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 RSPMInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or RSPM More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 15.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF has a beta of 1.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.008%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or RSPM?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or RSPM?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- RSPMInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or XLB?
State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- XLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or XLB?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 XLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or XLB More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 15.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.501%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or XLB?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or XLB?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- XLBState Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or XME?
State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- XMEState Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or XME?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 XMEState Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or XME More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 15.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.668%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or XME?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.47%. State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or XME?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- XMEState Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Data Centers Be In Space?
With demand for data centers seemingly growing by the day,…
Why Did SoundHound AI Stock Go Up?
SoundHound AI (NASDAQ:SOUN) has moved higher in recent days, breaking…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Sell
47
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
56
INTC alert for Jan 24
Intel Corp. [INTC] is down 17.01% over the past day.
Buy
64
BNR alert for Jan 24
Burning Rock Biotech Ltd. [BNR] is down 12.81% over the past day.
Sell
19
APGE alert for Jan 24
Apogee Therapeutics, Inc. [APGE] is down 12.28% over the past day.
