Will NVIDIA Return to Its 52-Week High?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been among the best-performing investments of the…
Sell
43
FMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$45.55
Seasonality move
:
1.06%
Day range:
$44.11 - $45.67
52-week range:
$41.39 - $55.28
Dividend yield:
1.81%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
47.8K
Avg. volume:
117.3K
1-year change:
-11.93%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
$45.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.81% | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
$35.52 | -- | -- | -- | $0.53 | 1.94% | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
$7.34 | -- | -- | -- | $0.50 | 7.81% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$5.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.44 | 8.32% | -- |
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
$177.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.83 | 1.88% | -- |
|
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
|
$70.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 2.27% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | 1.169 | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.104 | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | 0.705 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 0.321 | -- | -- |
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | 1.182 | -- | -- |
|
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
|
-- | 1.122 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FMAT
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILIT
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VAW
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WOOD
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or COPX?
Global X Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or COPX?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than Global X Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or COPX More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.754%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or COPX?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Global X Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or COPX?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or ILIT?
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or ILIT?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or ILIT More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or ILIT?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or ILIT?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- ILITiShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or LITP?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or LITP More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or LITP?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 8.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or LITP?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or VAW?
Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or VAW?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or VAW More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or VAW?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or VAW?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Materials Index Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- VAWVanguard Materials Index Fund ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FMAT or WOOD?
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- WOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FMAT or WOOD?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF, analysts believe Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF0 0 0 WOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF0 0 0 -
Is FMAT or WOOD More Risky?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.513%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FMAT or WOOD?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.81%. iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FMAT or WOOD?
Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FMATFidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF-- -- -- -- WOODiShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will JP Morgan’s AI Advisor Be a Winner?
JPMorgan Chase is rolling out “JPM WealthAI for high-net-worth clients.…
Is Revolve Group Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Recently, Revolve Group (NYSE:RVLV) management delivered some fairly positive business…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
