Financhill
Buy
59

FILL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$23.78
Seasonality move :
4.94%
Day range:
$23.75 - $24.14
52-week range:
$22.09 - $27.99
Dividend yield:
4.12%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
5.3K
Avg. volume:
9.1K
1-year change:
-5.86%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FILL
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
-- -- -- -- --
COAL
Range Global Coal Index ETF
-- -- -- -- --
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
-- -- -- -- --
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
-- -- -- -- --
VDE
Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF
-- -- -- -- --
XLE
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FILL
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
$24.12 -- -- -- $0.59 4.12% --
COAL
Range Global Coal Index ETF
$17.89 -- -- -- $0.37 2.09% --
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
$29.67 -- -- -- $1.54 5.19% --
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
$40.76 -- -- -- $0.84 4.28% --
VDE
Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF
$126.50 -- -- -- $0.97 3.1% --
XLE
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
$89.76 -- -- -- $0.70 3.2% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FILL
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
-- 0.574 -- --
COAL
Range Global Coal Index ETF
-- 0.855 -- --
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
-- 1.143 -- --
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
-- 0.669 -- --
VDE
Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF
-- 0.914 -- --
XLE
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
-- 0.885 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FILL
iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
COAL
Range Global Coal Index ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
VDE
Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF
-- -- -- -- -- --
XLE
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
-- -- -- -- -- --

iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FILL or COAL?

    Range Global Coal Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat Range Global Coal Index ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- --
    COAL
    Range Global Coal Index ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FILL or COAL?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Range Global Coal Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than Range Global Coal Index ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than Range Global Coal Index ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    0 0 0
    COAL
    Range Global Coal Index ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is FILL or COAL More Risky?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.93000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Global Coal Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FILL or COAL?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Range Global Coal Index ETF offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Range Global Coal Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FILL or COAL?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Range Global Coal Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than Range Global Coal Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Range Global Coal Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for Range Global Coal Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- -- --
    COAL
    Range Global Coal Index ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FILL or CRAK?

    VanEck Oil Refiners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Oil Refiners ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- --
    CRAK
    VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FILL or CRAK?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Oil Refiners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Oil Refiners ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than VanEck Oil Refiners ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    0 0 0
    CRAK
    VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is FILL or CRAK More Risky?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.93000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Oil Refiners ETF has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.653%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FILL or CRAK?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. VanEck Oil Refiners ETF offers a yield of 5.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Oil Refiners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FILL or CRAK?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Oil Refiners ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Oil Refiners ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Oil Refiners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- -- --
    CRAK
    VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FILL or IXC?

    iShares Global Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Global Energy ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- --
    IXC
    iShares Global Energy ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FILL or IXC?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Global Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Global Energy ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than iShares Global Energy ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    0 0 0
    IXC
    iShares Global Energy ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is FILL or IXC More Risky?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.93000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Global Energy ETF has a beta of 1.049, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.935%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FILL or IXC?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. iShares Global Energy ETF offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.84 per share. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Global Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FILL or IXC?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Global Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Global Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Global Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Global Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- -- --
    IXC
    iShares Global Energy ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FILL or VDE?

    Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- --
    VDE
    Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FILL or VDE?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    0 0 0
    VDE
    Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF
    0 0 0
  • Is FILL or VDE More Risky?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.93000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.401%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FILL or VDE?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FILL or VDE?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- -- --
    VDE
    Vanguard Energy Index Fund ETF
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns FILL or XLE?

    Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net margin of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's return on equity of -- beat Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- --
    XLE
    Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About FILL or XLE?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has higher upside potential than Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund, analysts believe iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is more attractive than Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    0 0 0
    XLE
    Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
    0 0 0
  • Is FILL or XLE More Risky?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a beta of 1.009, which suggesting that the stock is 0.93000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.214%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FILL or XLE?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.12%. Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FILL or XLE?

    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's net income of -- is lower than Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF is -- versus -- for Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FILL
    iShares MSCI Global Energy Producers ETF
    -- -- -- --
    XLE
    Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is the Market Going to Go Lower?
Is the Market Going to Go Lower?

The last month has been extremely difficult for the stock…

2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession
2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession

While many economists and investors initially expected 2025 to be…

Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?
Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?

There is a lot going on in the electric vehicle…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
63
EXOD alert for Mar 18

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 2.29% over the past day.

Sell
45
MNPR alert for Mar 18

Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is down 0.23% over the past day.

Sell
47
CELH alert for Mar 18

Celsius Holdings [CELH] is up 0.27% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock