Will Tesla Stock Go Up In 2026?
EV giant Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has, somewhat surprisingly, undershot the broader…
Sell
24
CSNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.39
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$30.33 - $30.53
52-week range:
$21.32 - $30.91
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
9K
Avg. volume:
10.4K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTWO
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGE
iShares North American Natural Res ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NRES
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
|
$30.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0% | -- |
|
FTWO
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF
|
$40.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.41% | -- |
|
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
|
$62.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.76 | 3.42% | -- |
|
IGE
iShares North American Natural Res ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NRES
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF
|
$29.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 3.09% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
FTWO
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF
|
-- | 1.488 | -- | -- |
|
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | 0.664 | -- | -- |
|
IGE
iShares North American Natural Res ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NRES
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | 0.761 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTWO
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IGE
iShares North American Natural Res ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NRES
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CSNR or FTWO?
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's net margin of --. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF-- -- -- FTWOStrive Natural Resources and Security ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CSNR or FTWO?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has higher upside potential than Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF, analysts believe Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF is more attractive than Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF0 0 0 FTWOStrive Natural Resources and Security ETF0 0 0 -
Is CSNR or FTWO More Risky?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSNR or FTWO?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSNR or FTWO?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF quarterly revenues of --. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF's net income of --. Notably, Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF is -- versus -- for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF-- -- -- -- FTWOStrive Natural Resources and Security ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CSNR or GNR?
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's net margin of --. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF-- -- -- GNRSPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CSNR or GNR?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF, analysts believe Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF0 0 0 GNRSPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 -
Is CSNR or GNR More Risky?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.177%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSNR or GNR?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSNR or GNR?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues of --. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF's net income of --. Notably, Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF-- -- -- -- GNRSPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CSNR or IGE?
iShares North American Natural Res ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's net margin of --. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares North American Natural Res ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF-- -- -- IGEiShares North American Natural Res ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CSNR or IGE?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares North American Natural Res ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has higher upside potential than iShares North American Natural Res ETF, analysts believe Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF is more attractive than iShares North American Natural Res ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF0 0 0 IGEiShares North American Natural Res ETF0 0 0 -
Is CSNR or IGE More Risky?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares North American Natural Res ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSNR or IGE?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares North American Natural Res ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares North American Natural Res ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSNR or IGE?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares North American Natural Res ETF quarterly revenues of --. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares North American Natural Res ETF's net income of --. Notably, Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares North American Natural Res ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF is -- versus -- for iShares North American Natural Res ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF-- -- -- -- IGEiShares North American Natural Res ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CSNR or NRES?
Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's net margin of --. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF-- -- -- NRESXtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CSNR or NRES?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF, analysts believe Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF0 0 0 NRESXtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 -
Is CSNR or NRES More Risky?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CSNR or NRES?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CSNR or NRES?
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues of --. Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF's net income of --. Notably, Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF-- -- -- -- NRESXtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Are the Best AI Power Stocks?
As the construction of AI infrastructure accelerates, the gap between…
Is IONQ The Best Quantum Stock to Buy?
Riding a wave of investor enthusiasm for the technology, quantum…
Stock Ideas
Sell
49
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 60x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
71
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
39
SMX alert for Dec 16
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 14.69% over the past day.
Sell
33
ZBIO alert for Dec 16
Zenas BioPharma, Inc. [ZBIO] is up 12.34% over the past day.
Sell
38
HUT alert for Dec 16
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 2.79% over the past day.
