Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
35
CBON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$22.70
Seasonality move
:
-0.51%
Day range:
$22.60 - $22.60
52-week range:
$21.34 - $22.70
Dividend yield:
1.8%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
380
Avg. volume:
1.5K
1-year change:
2.29%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIJ
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
$22.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.8% | -- |
|
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
|
$25.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 4.1% | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
$26.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 3.99% | -- |
|
IBIJ
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF
|
$26.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 4.21% | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF
|
$21.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 4.55% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.080 | -- | -- |
|
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | 0.140 | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | 0.266 | -- | -- |
|
IBIJ
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | 1.028 | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF
|
-- | 1.009 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBON
VanEck China Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBIJ
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MIG
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck China Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or IBIC?
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- IBICiShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or IBIC?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 IBICiShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or IBIC More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.545, which suggesting that the stock is 45.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or IBIC?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF offers a yield of 4.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or IBIC?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- IBICiShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or IBID?
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or IBID?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or IBID More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.545, which suggesting that the stock is 45.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or IBID?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF offers a yield of 3.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or IBID?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- IBIDiShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or IBIJ?
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- IBIJiShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or IBIJ?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 IBIJiShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or IBIJ More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.545, which suggesting that the stock is 45.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or IBIJ?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or IBIJ?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- IBIJiShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or MIG?
Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or MIG?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc., analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBON or MIG More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.545, which suggesting that the stock is 45.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or MIG?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or MIG?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc. quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Meadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MIGMeadowbrook Insurance Group Inc.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBON or NUAG?
Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck China Bond ETF's net margin of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- NUAGNuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBON or NUAG?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck China Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF, analysts believe VanEck China Bond ETF is more attractive than Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBONVanEck China Bond ETF0 0 0 NUAGNuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CBON or NUAG More Risky?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a beta of 0.545, which suggesting that the stock is 45.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.077%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBON or NUAG?
VanEck China Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. VanEck China Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBON or NUAG?
VanEck China Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck China Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck China Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck China Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Nuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBONVanEck China Bond ETF-- -- -- -- NUAGNuveen Enhanced Yield US Aggregate Bond ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 21.86% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 39.76% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 7.15% over the past day.
