BYLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF, analysts believe iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF is more attractive than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a beta of 0.855, which suggesting that the stock is 14.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has a beta of 1.322, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.175%.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF's return on equity of --.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF, analysts believe iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF is more attractive than SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a beta of 0.855, which suggesting that the stock is 14.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.244%.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF's return on equity of --.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF, analysts believe iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF is more attractive than iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a beta of 0.855, which suggesting that the stock is 14.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.779%.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF offers a yield of 4.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of --.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century Multisector Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has higher upside potential than American Century Multisector Income ETF, analysts believe iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF is more attractive than American Century Multisector Income ETF.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a beta of 0.855, which suggesting that the stock is 14.535% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. American Century Multisector Income ETF offers a yield of 6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century Multisector Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF is -- versus -- for American Century Multisector Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.