Is Lucid Group Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Lucid Group (LCID) is an EV manufacturer with a focus…
Buy
91
BULZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$128.05
Seasonality move
:
19.71%
Day range:
$123.20 - $128.65
52-week range:
$57.00 - $206.23
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
342K
Avg. volume:
331.8K
1-year change:
4.9%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BULZ
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BULZ
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
|
$127.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
$100.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 0.24% | -- |
|
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
|
$62.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.24% | -- |
|
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
|
$17.13 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 2.05% | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
$66.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 1.49% | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
$43.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 0.26% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BULZ
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | 3.815 | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | 2.195 | -- | -- |
|
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
|
-- | 2.267 | -- | -- |
|
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | 3.317 | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | 3.353 | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | 2.648 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BULZ
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROM
ProShares Ultra Technology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOXL
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USD
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BULZ or QLD?
ProShares Ultra QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULZ or QLD?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra QQQ, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares Ultra QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 QLDProShares Ultra QQQ0 0 0 -
Is BULZ or QLD More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra QQQ has a beta of 2.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 134.941%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULZ or QLD?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares Ultra QQQ offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULZ or QLD?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra QQQ quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra QQQ's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BULZ or ROM?
ProShares Ultra Technology has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Technology's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULZ or ROM?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Technology, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Technology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 ROMProShares Ultra Technology0 0 0 -
Is BULZ or ROM More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Technology has a beta of 2.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.859%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULZ or ROM?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares Ultra Technology offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULZ or ROM?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Technology quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Technology's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- ROMProShares Ultra Technology-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BULZ or SOXL?
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- SOXLDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULZ or SOXL?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 SOXLDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares0 0 0 -
Is BULZ or SOXL More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares has a beta of 4.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 324.919%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULZ or SOXL?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULZ or SOXL?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- SOXLDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BULZ or TQQQ?
ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraPro QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULZ or TQQQ?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraPro QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraPro QQQ, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares UltraPro QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ0 0 0 -
Is BULZ or TQQQ More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a beta of 3.522, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 252.185%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULZ or TQQQ?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares UltraPro QQQ offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraPro QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULZ or TQQQ?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraPro QQQ quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraPro QQQ's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraPro QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraPro QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BULZ or USD?
ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has a net margin of -- compared to MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net margin of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BULZ or USD?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors, analysts believe MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is more attractive than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors0 0 0 -
Is BULZ or USD More Risky?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra Semiconductors has a beta of 2.999, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 199.858%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BULZ or USD?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ProShares Ultra Semiconductors offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra Semiconductors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BULZ or USD?
MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors quarterly revenues of --. MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's net income of --. Notably, MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra Semiconductors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BULZMicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -- USDProShares Ultra Semiconductors-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Enovix an Underrated Small Cap?
Enovix (NASDAQ:ENVX) is one of several small, innovative companies hoping…
Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
64
RGC alert for May 13
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 28.41% over the past day.
Buy
82
NRG alert for May 13
NRG Energy [NRG] is up 26.29% over the past day.
Sell
44
GDXU alert for May 13
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 22.92% over the past day.
