Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
42
BATT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.91
Seasonality move
:
-5.2%
Day range:
$13.80 - $13.95
52-week range:
$6.78 - $14.14
Dividend yield:
2.01%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
98.7K
Avg. volume:
70.4K
1-year change:
54.17%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
$13.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 2.01% | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
$70.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 1.11% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$29.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.31% | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
$11.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.89 | 7.64% | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
$84.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.02% | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
$112.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 0.8% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | 1.492 | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | 1.575 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.698 | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | 1.525 | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.400 | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | 1.581 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or COPX?
Global X Copper Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Copper Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or COPX?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Copper Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Copper Miners ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Global X Copper Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or COPX More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Copper Miners ETF has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.342%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or COPX?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Global X Copper Miners ETF offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Copper Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or COPX?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Copper Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Copper Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Copper Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Copper Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- COPXGlobal X Copper Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or CUT More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.268%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or LITP?
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or LITP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or LITP More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Lithium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or LITP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF offers a yield of 7.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or LITP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- LITPSprott Lithium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or PSCM?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or PSCM?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or PSCM More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has a beta of 1.224, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.379%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or PSCM?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or PSCM?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or PYZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or PYZ More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.982%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
