Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
33
BATT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.13
Seasonality move
:
-9.71%
Day range:
$8.91 - $9.24
52-week range:
$7.72 - $10.83
Dividend yield:
3.74%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
89.3K
Avg. volume:
41.8K
1-year change:
-12.66%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
$9.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 3.74% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$32.33 | -- | -- | -- | $0.78 | 0% | -- |
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
$25.98 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 1.83% | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
$42.16 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 1.44% | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
$73.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.83% | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
$87.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 1.3% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | 1.110 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 1.268 | -- | -- |
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | 0.518 | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.053 | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | 1.687 | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | 1.524 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PSCM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYZ
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or CUT More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.998, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.16699999999999%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or CUT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or ICOP?
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or ICOP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or ICOP More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or ICOP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or ICOP?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- ICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or LIT?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or LIT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or LIT More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.542%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or LIT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or LIT?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or PSCM?
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or PSCM?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or PSCM More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF has a beta of 1.261, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.1%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or PSCM?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or PSCM?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- PSCMInvesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BATT or PYZ?
Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net margin of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF, analysts believe Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF0 0 0 PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF0 0 0 -
Is BATT or PYZ More Risky?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.472% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF has a beta of 1.385, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.538%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BATT or PYZ?
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BATTAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF-- -- -- -- PYZInvesco Dorsey Wright Basic Materials Momentum ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 1.47% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 10% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 1.24% over the past day.
