Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
75
AUSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$46.95
Seasonality move
:
-0.94%
Day range:
$46.75 - $46.98
52-week range:
$38.55 - $46.98
Dividend yield:
2.78%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
57.1K
Avg. volume:
45.4K
1-year change:
10.38%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUSF
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEY
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PKW
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUSF
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
|
$46.95 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 2.78% | -- |
|
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
|
$46.41 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 2.34% | -- |
|
ONEV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF
|
$134.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.72 | 1.79% | -- |
|
ONEY
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
|
$114.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.13% | -- |
|
PKW
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF
|
$136.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 0.98% | -- |
|
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
|
$68.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 1.99% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUSF
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
|
-- | 0.479 | -- | -- |
|
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
|
-- | 0.331 | -- | -- |
|
ONEV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF
|
-- | 0.501 | -- | -- |
|
ONEY
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
|
-- | 0.575 | -- | -- |
|
PKW
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF
|
-- | 1.070 | -- | -- |
|
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
|
-- | 0.838 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUSF
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ONEY
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PKW
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or FVD?
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- FVDFirst Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or FVD?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 FVDFirst Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or FVD More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.781%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or FVD?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or FVD?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- FVDFirst Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or ONEV?
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- ONEVState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or ONEV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 ONEVState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or ONEV More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF has a beta of 0.871, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.861%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or ONEV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or ONEV?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- ONEVState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Vol Focus ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or ONEY?
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- ONEYState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or ONEY?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 ONEYState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or ONEY More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.431%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or ONEY?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or ONEY?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- ONEYState Street SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or PKW?
Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- PKWInvesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or PKW?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 PKWInvesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or PKW More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.51000000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or PKW?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or PKW?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- PKWInvesco Dynamic Buyback Achievers ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AUSF or SPVM?
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net margin of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- SPVMInvesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About AUSF or SPVM?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF, analysts believe Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF0 0 0 SPVMInvesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF0 0 0 -
Is AUSF or SPVM More Risky?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.372% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUSF or SPVM?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AUSF or SPVM?
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AUSFGlobal X Adaptive US Factor ETF-- -- -- -- SPVMInvesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.
