Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
44
ASIA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$33.65
Seasonality move
:
-1.61%
Day range:
$33.18 - $33.69
52-week range:
$22.70 - $35.12
Dividend yield:
0.24%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.8K
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
22.65%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
|
$33.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 0.24% | -- |
|
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
|
$93.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.56 | 1.75% | -- |
|
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
|
$96.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.82 | 2.4% | -- |
|
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
|
$29.78 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 1.73% | -- |
|
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
|
$38.94 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 2.69% | -- |
|
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
|
$35.85 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.19% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
|
-- | 1.049 | -- | -- |
|
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
|
-- | 0.865 | -- | -- |
|
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
|
-- | 1.098 | -- | -- |
|
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
|
-- | 0.793 | -- | -- |
|
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.914 | -- | -- |
|
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
|
-- | 1.187 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ASIA or AAXJ?
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- AAXJiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASIA or AAXJ?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF, analysts believe Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF0 0 0 AAXJiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF0 0 0 -
Is ASIA or AAXJ More Risky?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.701%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASIA or AAXJ?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASIA or AAXJ?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- -- AAXJiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASIA or AIA?
iShares Asia 50 ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Asia 50 ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- AIAiShares Asia 50 ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASIA or AIA?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Asia 50 ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Asia 50 ETF, analysts believe Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is more attractive than iShares Asia 50 ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF0 0 0 AIAiShares Asia 50 ETF0 0 0 -
Is ASIA or AIA More Risky?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Asia 50 ETF has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.226%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASIA or AIA?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. iShares Asia 50 ETF offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Asia 50 ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASIA or AIA?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Asia 50 ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Asia 50 ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Asia 50 ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Asia 50 ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- -- AIAiShares Asia 50 ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASIA or FLAX?
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- FLAXFranklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASIA or FLAX?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF, analysts believe Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF0 0 0 FLAXFranklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF0 0 0 -
Is ASIA or FLAX More Risky?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.795%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASIA or FLAX?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASIA or FLAX?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- -- FLAXFranklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASIA or FPA?
First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- FPAFirst Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASIA or FPA?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is more attractive than First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF0 0 0 FPAFirst Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is ASIA or FPA More Risky?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.276, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.556%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASIA or FPA?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASIA or FPA?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- -- FPAFirst Trust Asia Pacific Ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ASIA or MINV?
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net margin of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- MINVMatthews Asia Innovators Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ASIA or MINV?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has higher upside potential than Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF, analysts believe Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is more attractive than Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF0 0 0 MINVMatthews Asia Innovators Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is ASIA or MINV More Risky?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ASIA or MINV?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF offers a yield of 0.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ASIA or MINV?
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF is -- versus -- for Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ASIAMatthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF-- -- -- -- MINVMatthews Asia Innovators Active ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is down 12.74% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 62.68% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.8% over the past day.
