Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Sell
38
ACES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$26.59
Seasonality move
:
-8.28%
Day range:
$25.40 - $26.65
52-week range:
$25.40 - $36.79
Dividend yield:
1.09%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
482K
Avg. volume:
167.4K
1-year change:
-25.04%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
$26.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.09% | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
$14.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.51% | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
$24.50 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
|
$41.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
$20.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 2.75% | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$101.42 | -- | -- | -- | $1.75 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | 2.264 | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.181 | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | 2.873 | -- | -- |
|
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | 2.090 | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.363 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ACES or FAN?
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACES or FAN?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ALPS Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF, analysts believe ALPS Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACES or FAN More Risky?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.905%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACES or FAN?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ALPS Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACES or FAN?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, ALPS Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ALPS Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACES or HYDR?
Global X Hydrogen ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACES or HYDR?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Hydrogen ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ALPS Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Hydrogen ETF, analysts believe ALPS Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than Global X Hydrogen ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACES or HYDR More Risky?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACES or HYDR?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Global X Hydrogen ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ALPS Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACES or HYDR?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of --. Notably, ALPS Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Hydrogen ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ALPS Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Hydrogen ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACES or NUKZ?
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- NUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACES or NUKZ?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ALPS Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF, analysts believe ALPS Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 NUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACES or NUKZ More Risky?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACES or NUKZ?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ALPS Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACES or NUKZ?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, ALPS Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ALPS Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- NUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACES or PBW?
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACES or PBW?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ALPS Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF, analysts believe ALPS Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACES or PBW More Risky?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.732, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.175%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACES or PBW?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. ALPS Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACES or PBW?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, ALPS Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ALPS Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- PBWInvesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ACES or SMOG?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net margin of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ACES or SMOG?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ALPS Clean Energy ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, analysts believe ALPS Clean Energy ETF is more attractive than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is ACES or SMOG More Risky?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.475, which suggesting that the stock is 47.486% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.133%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ACES or SMOG?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share. ALPS Clean Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ACES or SMOG?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, ALPS Clean Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ALPS Clean Energy ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.65% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 4.9% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.4% over the past day.
