WTRG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Water Works has a net margin of 30.57% compared to Essential Utilities's net margin of 19.9%. Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75% beat American Water Works's return on equity of 10.38%.

Essential Utilities has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.73%. On the other hand American Water Works has an analysts' consensus of $138.34 which suggests that it could fall by -8.96%. Given that Essential Utilities has higher upside potential than American Water Works, analysts believe Essential Utilities is more attractive than American Water Works.

Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 20.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Water Works has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.307%.

Essential Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. American Water Works offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Essential Utilities pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. American Water Works pays out 55.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essential Utilities quarterly revenues are $604.4M, which are smaller than American Water Works quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M is lower than American Water Works's net income of $239M. Notably, Essential Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.73x while American Water Works's PE ratio is 28.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essential Utilities is 5.35x versus 6.33x for American Water Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

American States Water has a net margin of 30.57% compared to Essential Utilities's net margin of 19.87%. Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75% beat American States Water's return on equity of 14.17%.

Essential Utilities has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.73%. On the other hand American States Water has an analysts' consensus of $79.33 which suggests that it could fall by -0.47%. Given that Essential Utilities has higher upside potential than American States Water, analysts believe Essential Utilities is more attractive than American States Water.

Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 20.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American States Water has a beta of 0.564, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.597%.

Essential Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. American States Water offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Essential Utilities pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. American States Water pays out 56.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essential Utilities quarterly revenues are $604.4M, which are larger than American States Water quarterly revenues of $143.1M. Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M is higher than American States Water's net income of $28.4M. Notably, Essential Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.73x while American States Water's PE ratio is 25.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essential Utilities is 5.35x versus 5.03x for American States Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

California Water Service Group has a net margin of 30.57% compared to Essential Utilities's net margin of 8.85%. Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75% beat California Water Service Group's return on equity of 12.36%.

Essential Utilities has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.73%. On the other hand California Water Service Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.75 which suggests that it could grow by 14.53%. Given that California Water Service Group has higher upside potential than Essential Utilities, analysts believe California Water Service Group is more attractive than Essential Utilities.

Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 20.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.22%.

Essential Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. California Water Service Group offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Essential Utilities pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. California Water Service Group pays out 34.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essential Utilities quarterly revenues are $604.4M, which are larger than California Water Service Group quarterly revenues of $222.2M. Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M is higher than California Water Service Group's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Essential Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.73x while California Water Service Group's PE ratio is 15.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essential Utilities is 5.35x versus 2.80x for California Water Service Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Water Resources has a net margin of 30.57% compared to Essential Utilities's net margin of 3.34%. Essential Utilities's return on equity of 9.75% beat Global Water Resources's return on equity of 12.04%.

Essential Utilities has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.73%. On the other hand Global Water Resources has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 66.16%. Given that Global Water Resources has higher upside potential than Essential Utilities, analysts believe Global Water Resources is more attractive than Essential Utilities.

Essential Utilities has a beta of 0.800, which suggesting that the stock is 20.021% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Water Resources has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.156%.

Essential Utilities has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Global Water Resources offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Essential Utilities pays 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Water Resources pays out 126.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Utilities's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources's is not.

Essential Utilities quarterly revenues are $604.4M, which are larger than Global Water Resources quarterly revenues of $13.3M. Essential Utilities's net income of $184.8M is higher than Global Water Resources's net income of $443K. Notably, Essential Utilities's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.73x while Global Water Resources's PE ratio is 41.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essential Utilities is 5.35x versus 4.58x for Global Water Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.