UMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Commercial Corp. has a net margin of 13.88% compared to UMH Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 9.88%. UMH Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.93% beat Gladstone Commercial Corp.'s return on equity of 5.96%.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand Gladstone Commercial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.79%. Given that UMH Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gladstone Commercial Corp., analysts believe UMH Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Gladstone Commercial Corp..

UMH Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Commercial Corp. has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.181%.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. Gladstone Commercial Corp. offers a yield of 10.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. UMH Properties, Inc. pays 2575.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Commercial Corp. pays out 453.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMH Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.9M, which are larger than Gladstone Commercial Corp. quarterly revenues of $40.8M. UMH Properties, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M is higher than Gladstone Commercial Corp.'s net income of $4M. Notably, UMH Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 211.53x while Gladstone Commercial Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties, Inc. is 5.26x versus 3.38x for Gladstone Commercial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LXP Industrial Trust has a net margin of 13.88% compared to UMH Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 48.64%. UMH Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.93% beat LXP Industrial Trust's return on equity of 5.78%.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand LXP Industrial Trust has an analysts' consensus of $54.36 which suggests that it could grow by 10.04%. Given that UMH Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than LXP Industrial Trust, analysts believe UMH Properties, Inc. is more attractive than LXP Industrial Trust.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LXP Industrial Trust has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.031%.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. LXP Industrial Trust offers a yield of 5.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. UMH Properties, Inc. pays 2575.76% of its earnings as a dividend. LXP Industrial Trust pays out 403.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMH Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.9M, which are smaller than LXP Industrial Trust quarterly revenues of $86.9M. UMH Properties, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M is lower than LXP Industrial Trust's net income of $42.3M. Notably, UMH Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 211.53x while LXP Industrial Trust's PE ratio is 29.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties, Inc. is 5.26x versus 23.76x for LXP Industrial Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. has a net margin of 13.88% compared to UMH Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 11.18%. UMH Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.93% beat Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.38%.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.41%. Given that UMH Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc., analysts believe UMH Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc..

UMH Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. has a beta of 0.674, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.571%.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. offers a yield of 6.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. UMH Properties, Inc. pays 2575.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. pays out 223.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMH Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.9M, which are smaller than Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. quarterly revenues of $201.4M. UMH Properties, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M is lower than Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.'s net income of $22.5M. Notably, UMH Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 211.53x while Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties, Inc. is 5.26x versus 6.12x for Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UDR, Inc. has a net margin of 13.88% compared to UMH Properties, Inc.'s net margin of 9.99%. UMH Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.93% beat UDR, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.65%.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a consensus price target of $18.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.17%. On the other hand UDR, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.36 which suggests that it could grow by 7.49%. Given that UMH Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than UDR, Inc., analysts believe UMH Properties, Inc. is more attractive than UDR, Inc..

UMH Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.086, which suggesting that the stock is 8.603% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UDR, Inc. has a beta of 0.719, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.057%.

UMH Properties, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.51%. UDR, Inc. offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. UMH Properties, Inc. pays 2575.76% of its earnings as a dividend. UDR, Inc. pays out 662.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMH Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues are $66.9M, which are smaller than UDR, Inc. quarterly revenues of $431.9M. UMH Properties, Inc.'s net income of $9.3M is lower than UDR, Inc.'s net income of $43.1M. Notably, UMH Properties, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 211.53x while UDR, Inc.'s PE ratio is 85.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties, Inc. is 5.26x versus 7.31x for UDR, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.