UI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of 22.8% compared to Ubiquiti's net margin of -38.51%. Ubiquiti's return on equity of 381.02% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -65.2%.

Ubiquiti has a consensus price target of $331.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.68%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 190.7%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Ubiquiti, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Ubiquiti.

Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.594% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.555, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.463%.

Ubiquiti has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ubiquiti pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ubiquiti quarterly revenues are $599.9M, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.6M. Ubiquiti's net income of $136.8M is higher than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of -$48.7M. Notably, Ubiquiti's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.16x while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ubiquiti is 8.73x versus 0.10x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of 22.8% compared to Ubiquiti's net margin of 17.16%. Ubiquiti's return on equity of 381.02% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 9.19%.

Ubiquiti has a consensus price target of $331.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.68%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 21.01%. Given that Harmonic has higher upside potential than Ubiquiti, analysts believe Harmonic is more attractive than Ubiquiti.

Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.594% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.243%.

Ubiquiti has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ubiquiti pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ubiquiti quarterly revenues are $599.9M, which are larger than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $222.2M. Ubiquiti's net income of $136.8M is higher than Harmonic's net income of $38.1M. Notably, Ubiquiti's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.16x while Harmonic's PE ratio is 29.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ubiquiti is 8.73x versus 1.65x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keysight Technologies has a net margin of 22.8% compared to Ubiquiti's net margin of 13.02%. Ubiquiti's return on equity of 381.02% beat Keysight Technologies's return on equity of 12.1%.

Ubiquiti has a consensus price target of $331.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.68%. On the other hand Keysight Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $184.86 which suggests that it could grow by 22.13%. Given that Keysight Technologies has higher upside potential than Ubiquiti, analysts believe Keysight Technologies is more attractive than Ubiquiti.

Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.594% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keysight Technologies has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.732%.

Ubiquiti has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Keysight Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ubiquiti pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Keysight Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ubiquiti's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ubiquiti quarterly revenues are $599.9M, which are smaller than Keysight Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Ubiquiti's net income of $136.8M is lower than Keysight Technologies's net income of $169M. Notably, Ubiquiti's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.16x while Keysight Technologies's PE ratio is 43.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ubiquiti is 8.73x versus 5.24x for Keysight Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Motorola Solutions has a net margin of 22.8% compared to Ubiquiti's net margin of 20.29%. Ubiquiti's return on equity of 381.02% beat Motorola Solutions's return on equity of 153.02%.

Ubiquiti has a consensus price target of $331.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.68%. On the other hand Motorola Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $518.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.53%. Given that Motorola Solutions has higher upside potential than Ubiquiti, analysts believe Motorola Solutions is more attractive than Ubiquiti.

Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.116, which suggesting that the stock is 11.594% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorola Solutions has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.5%.

Ubiquiti has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Motorola Solutions offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. Ubiquiti pays 41.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorola Solutions pays out 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ubiquiti quarterly revenues are $599.9M, which are smaller than Motorola Solutions quarterly revenues of $3B. Ubiquiti's net income of $136.8M is lower than Motorola Solutions's net income of $611M. Notably, Ubiquiti's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.16x while Motorola Solutions's PE ratio is 46.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ubiquiti is 8.73x versus 6.79x for Motorola Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.