Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
75
STK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$37.86
Seasonality move
:
4.71%
Day range:
$37.74 - $38.06
52-week range:
$23.05 - $39.74
Dividend yield:
7.16%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
54.8K
Avg. volume:
77.7K
1-year change:
8.69%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EOI
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETJ
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
|
$37.91 | -- | -- | -- | $1.33 | 7.16% | -- |
|
EOI
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund
|
$19.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 8.16% | -- |
|
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
|
$23.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 7.92% | -- |
|
ETJ
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
|
$8.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 8.84% | -- |
|
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
|
$29.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 10.69% | -- |
|
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
|
$28.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.56 | 7.84% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
|
-- | 1.346 | -- | -- |
|
EOI
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund
|
-- | 1.044 | -- | -- |
|
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
|
-- | 1.025 | -- | -- |
|
ETJ
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
|
-- | 0.603 | -- | -- |
|
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
|
-- | 1.338 | -- | -- |
|
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
|
-- | 0.929 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
STK
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EOI
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EOS
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ETJ
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KQQQ
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns STK or EOI?
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net margin of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- EOIEaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About STK or EOI?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund, analysts believe Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund0 0 0 EOIEaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is STK or EOI More Risky?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.007%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock STK or EOI?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund offers a yield of 8.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios STK or EOI?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- -- EOIEaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns STK or EOS?
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net margin of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- EOSEaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About STK or EOS?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II, analysts believe Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund0 0 0 EOSEaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II0 0 0 -
Is STK or EOS More Risky?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.432%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock STK or EOS?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II offers a yield of 7.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios STK or EOS?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- -- EOSEaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns STK or ETJ?
Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net margin of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- ETJEaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About STK or ETJ?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund, analysts believe Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is more attractive than Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund0 0 0 ETJEaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is STK or ETJ More Risky?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund has a beta of 0.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.591%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock STK or ETJ?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund offers a yield of 8.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios STK or ETJ?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- -- ETJEaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns STK or KQQQ?
Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net margin of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's return on equity of -- beat Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- KQQQKurv Technology Titans Select ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About STK or KQQQ?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has higher upside potential than Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF, analysts believe Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is more attractive than Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund0 0 0 KQQQKurv Technology Titans Select ETF0 0 0 -
Is STK or KQQQ More Risky?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock STK or KQQQ?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF offers a yield of 10.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios STK or KQQQ?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net income of -- is lower than Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is -- versus -- for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- -- KQQQKurv Technology Titans Select ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns STK or QQQX?
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net margin of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's return on equity of -- beat Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- QQQXNuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About STK or QQQX?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has higher upside potential than Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund, analysts believe Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is more attractive than Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund0 0 0 QQQXNuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund0 0 0 -
Is STK or QQQX More Risky?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.927%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock STK or QQQX?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a quarterly dividend of $1.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.16%. Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund offers a yield of 7.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios STK or QQQX?
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund quarterly revenues of --. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's net income of -- is lower than Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's net income of --. Notably, Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is -- versus -- for Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income STKColumbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund-- -- -- -- QQQXNuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
